use target compiler on llvm-bitcode-linker

[onur-ozkan]

The build compiler is already resolved inside the ToolBuild step, so we should pass only the target compilers for Mode::ToolRustc tools.

Fixes #138123

r? ghost

try-job: dist-powerpc64le-linux

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in src/tools/opt-dist

cc @Kobzol

[onur-ozkan]

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit f881d7d with merge 2b0fbc0...

[Kobzol]

I don't know if you saw my message in the previous PR, but you don't have to modify opt-dist for this 😆 It's not even executed for the powerpc job.

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 2b0fbc0 (2b0fbc0cdc8351b6b4986eb731bc910610101ea8)

[onur-ozkan]

We are back to ~2h45m duration with this change.

@rustbot ready

r? bootstrap

[jieyouxu]

Thanks, r=me after PR CI is green.

[onur-ozkan]

@bors r=jieyouxu p=1

[bors]

📌 Commit 4227055 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 4227055 with merge c53af1c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing c53af1c to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (c53af1c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.1%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.6%, secondary -5.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-5.8%	[-5.8%, -5.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.8%, secondary 1.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.8%	[2.8%, 2.8%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.0%	[2.2%, 3.9%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.8%	[2.8%, 2.8%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 766.551s -> 765.734s (-0.11%)
Artifact size: 362.09 MiB -> 362.10 MiB (0.00%)

[Kobzol]

Awesome! :) (it's ordered from newest to oldest)