Address annotate-snippets test differences#149065
Merged
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom Nov 22, 2025
Merged
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Muscraft
force-pushed
the
annotate-snippets-regressions
branch
from
6611118 to
83485b9
Compare
Collaborator
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
davidtwco
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2025
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2025
…ions, r=davidtwco Address annotate-snippets test differences When `annotate-snippets` became the default renderer on `nightly`, it came with a few rendering differences. I was not entirely happy with a few of the differences, and after talking with `@davidtwco` about them, I decided to address those that seemed like regressions. r? `@davidtwco`
This was referenced Nov 22, 2025
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #148407 (Warn against calls which mutate an interior mutable `const`-item) - #149065 (Address annotate-snippets test differences) - #149072 (Fix the issue of unused assignment from MIR liveness checking) - #149077 (feat: Enable annotate-snippets' simd feature) - #149168 (Fix ICE when collecting opaques from trait method declarations) - #149180 (Couple of refactors to SharedEmitter) - #149185 (Handle cycles when checking impl candidates for `doc(hidden)`) - #149194 (Move safe computation out of unsafe block) - #149204 (Fix typo in HashMap performance comment) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2025
Rollup merge of #149065 - Muscraft:annotate-snippets-regressions, r=davidtwco Address annotate-snippets test differences When `annotate-snippets` became the default renderer on `nightly`, it came with a few rendering differences. I was not entirely happy with a few of the differences, and after talking with ``@davidtwco`` about them, I decided to address those that seemed like regressions. r? ``@davidtwco``
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When
annotate-snippetsbecame the default renderer onnightly, it came with a few rendering differences. I was not entirely happy with a few of the differences, and after talking with @davidtwco about them, I decided to address those that seemed like regressions.r? @davidtwco