inline constant localized typeck constraint computation#149639
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom Jan 23, 2026
Merged
inline constant localized typeck constraint computation#149639rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
1d6cfb2 to
38f795d
Compare
Collaborator
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
21 tasks
Member
|
@bors r+ Sorry for the review delay |
Contributor
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
…h726 inline constant localized typeck constraint computation This fixes an oversight in the previous PRs, this constraint is local to a point (and liveness does the rest) and so has a fixed direction. I wasn't planning on trying to improve the impl for perf, versus computing loan liveness without first unifying the cfg and subset graph, but it's like a 20x improvement for typeck constraints on wg-grammar (-15% end-to-end) for a trivial fix. r? @jackh726 In general, I want to cleanup these edges to avoid off-by-one errors in constraints at effectful statements and ensure the midpoint-avoidance strategy is sound and works well, in particular with respect to edges that flow backwards from the result into its inputs. But I'd like to start from something that passes all tests and is simpler, because the eventual solution may 1. involve localizing these edges differently than *separate* liveness and typeck lowering passes/approaches, which would need to be lowered at the same time for example. I'm already doing the latter in the loan liveness rewrite as part of creating edges on-demand during traversal, and this new structure would be a better fit to verify, or fix, these subtle edges. 2. also require changes in MIR typeck to track the flow across points more precisely, and I don't know how hard that would be. *Computing* the constraint direction is currently a workaround for that. Therefore, in a future PR, I'll also remove this computation from the terminator constraints, but I can also do that in this PR if you'd prefer.
This was referenced Jan 23, 2026
rust-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #149639 (inline constant localized typeck constraint computation) - #150780 (Add -Z large-data-threshold) - #151520 (Rename `HandleCycleError` to `CycleErrorHandling`) - #151525 (update enzyme, includes an extra patch to fix MacOS builds in CI) - #151527 (Clean up or resolve cfg-related instances of `FIXME(f16_f128)`) r? @ghost
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2026
Rollup merge of #149639 - lqd:fix-typeck-constraints, r=jackh726 inline constant localized typeck constraint computation This fixes an oversight in the previous PRs, this constraint is local to a point (and liveness does the rest) and so has a fixed direction. I wasn't planning on trying to improve the impl for perf, versus computing loan liveness without first unifying the cfg and subset graph, but it's like a 20x improvement for typeck constraints on wg-grammar (-15% end-to-end) for a trivial fix. r? @jackh726 In general, I want to cleanup these edges to avoid off-by-one errors in constraints at effectful statements and ensure the midpoint-avoidance strategy is sound and works well, in particular with respect to edges that flow backwards from the result into its inputs. But I'd like to start from something that passes all tests and is simpler, because the eventual solution may 1. involve localizing these edges differently than *separate* liveness and typeck lowering passes/approaches, which would need to be lowered at the same time for example. I'm already doing the latter in the loan liveness rewrite as part of creating edges on-demand during traversal, and this new structure would be a better fit to verify, or fix, these subtle edges. 2. also require changes in MIR typeck to track the flow across points more precisely, and I don't know how hard that would be. *Computing* the constraint direction is currently a workaround for that. Therefore, in a future PR, I'll also remove this computation from the terminator constraints, but I can also do that in this PR if you'd prefer.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes an oversight in the previous PRs, this constraint is local to a point (and liveness does the rest) and so has a fixed direction.
I wasn't planning on trying to improve the impl for perf, versus computing loan liveness without first unifying the cfg and subset graph, but it's like a 20x improvement for typeck constraints on wg-grammar (-15% end-to-end) for a trivial fix.
r? @jackh726
In general, I want to cleanup these edges to avoid off-by-one errors in constraints at effectful statements and ensure the midpoint-avoidance strategy is sound and works well, in particular with respect to edges that flow backwards from the result into its inputs. But I'd like to start from something that passes all tests and is simpler, because the eventual solution may
Therefore, in a future PR, I'll also remove this computation from the terminator constraints, but I can also do that in this PR if you'd prefer.