Port #[rustc_no_implicit_autorefs], #[rustc_lint_opt_ty], and #[rustc_lint_query_instability] attributes to be parsed

[Bryntet]

This PR ports three simple internal rustc attributes to be parsed in a single PR to avoid having to resolve multiple rebase confilicts

r? @JonathanBrouwer

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_hir/src/attrs

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs

cc @jdonszelmann

[JonathanBrouwer]

r=me when rebased on the current rollup

View changes since this review

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

[JonathanBrouwer]

@bors try @rust-timer queue
Stuff has been surprisingly perf sensitive so wanna be sure

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 3415958 (3415958309dce466b1f8b9d2f11dbb36d5b2dcc5, parent: 68f11a11b666b36137374b6e54fc0d013a3b26cf)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (3415958): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.1%, 0.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.3%, secondary -1.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.9%	[0.9%, 0.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.8%, -2.1%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.2%	[-1.9%, -0.8%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-2.8%, 0.9%]	3

Cycles

Results (primary -2.1%, secondary -4.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.5%	[-4.5%, -4.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.1%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 483.218s -> 482.732s (-0.10%)
Artifact size: 390.58 MiB -> 390.57 MiB (-0.00%)

[JonathanBrouwer]

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 96e453d has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.