Skip to content

Implement BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec#152502

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Dan54:heap-from-raw-vec
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

Implement BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec#152502
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Dan54:heap-from-raw-vec

Conversation

@Dan54
Copy link
Contributor

@Dan54 Dan54 commented Feb 11, 2026

Implements #152500.

Adds a BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec function, which constructs a BinaryHeap without performing a heapify, for data that is already a max-heap.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 11, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 11, 2026

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: libs
  • libs expanded to 7 candidates

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me. Thanks!

r? scottmcm
@bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Feb 12, 2026

📌 Commit 9383138 has been approved by scottmcm

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 12, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors bot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 12, 2026
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2026
Implement `BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec`

Implements rust-lang#152500.

Adds a `BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec` function, which constructs a `BinaryHeap` without performing a heapify, for data that is already a max-heap.
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2026
Rollup of 17 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #142415 (Add note when inherent impl for a alias type defined outside of the crate)
 - #142680 (Fix passing/returning structs with the 64-bit SPARC ABI)
 - #150768 (Don't compute FnAbi for LLVM intrinsics in backends)
 - #151152 (Add FCW for derive helper attributes that will conflict with built-in attributes)
 - #151814 (layout: handle rigid aliases without params)
 - #151863 (Borrowck: simplify diagnostics for placeholders)
 - #152159 (Add note for `?Sized` params in int-ptr casts diag)
 - #152434 (Clarify names of `QueryVTable` functions for "executing" a query)
 - #152478 (Remove tm_factory field from CodegenContext)
 - #152498 (Partially revert "resolve: Update `NameBindingData::vis` in place")
 - #152316 (fix: add continue)
 - #152394 (Correctly check if a macro call is actually a macro call in rustdoc highlighter)
 - #152425 (Port #![test_runner] to the attribute parser)
 - #152481 (Use cg_ssa's produce_final_output_artifacts in cg_clif)
 - #152485 (fix issue#152482)
 - #152495 (Clean up some subdiagnostics)
 - #152502 (Implement `BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec`)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit faac3c5 into rust-lang:main Feb 12, 2026
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2026
Rollup merge of #152502 - Dan54:heap-from-raw-vec, r=scottmcm

Implement `BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec`

Implements #152500.

Adds a `BinaryHeap::from_raw_vec` function, which constructs a `BinaryHeap` without performing a heapify, for data that is already a max-heap.
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.95.0 milestone Feb 12, 2026
@Dan54 Dan54 deleted the heap-from-raw-vec branch February 12, 2026 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants