Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should definitely not be allowed as written here; There's even a comment saying so in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57730/files#diff-1b4892578c33275e3b1ff1fe43b7f2f9.
Instead, this should be moved to test/ui/impl-trait/where.rs as an example of what isn't allowed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see there's already tests for that. I just removed this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well not exactly impl A<impl B>... it would be nice to have such a test.
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
@Zoxc This is now fixing a PR, not an issue... |
|
It fixes a bug introduced in the PR. Technically it fixes #57979 too, but we may want to keep that open until we actually error on the example there. |
|
Per my comment here, this could was never actually meant to be accepted. I haven't read the details of this PR yet, so I'm not sure precisely what we should do make it start erroring again -- or maybe we want a future compatibility warning. |
|
This PR just fixed a bug which causes part of AST validation to be skipped. We definitely want to merge this. |
|
@Zoxc Ok; Can you add tests ensuring that #57979 (comment) (in return position also) doesn't compile? |
|
@Centril I'm not sure what you mean. That does compile. |
|
📌 Commit e6d5f25 has been approved by |
|
Hmm, according to my local testing, we still see the expected error here, even with this patch applied. I'm pushing a test case, let's see what travis thinks. |
1ec3ea2 to
9d2a0b9
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
r=me if travis is happy. As discussed in the compiler meeting, this PR seems to fix an obvious bug, but I don't think that it actually affects the behavior of #57979 at all. I added a regression test for the moment that documents the behavior in that case, since apparently it was untested. Locally, that test passes for me. |
|
@bors r=nikomatsakis |
|
📌 Commit cce2c89 has been approved by |
Rollup of 19 pull requests Successful merges: - #57929 (Rustdoc remove old style files) - #57981 (Fix #57730) - #58074 (Stabilize slice_sort_by_cached_key) - #58196 (Add specific feature gate error for const-unstable features) - #58293 (Remove code for updating copyright years in generate-deriving-span-tests) - #58306 (Don't default on std crate when manipulating browser history) - #58359 (librustc_mir: use ? in impl_snapshot_for! macro) - #58395 (Instant::checked_duration_since) - #58429 (fix Box::into_unique effecitvely transmuting to a raw ptr) - #58433 (Update which libcore/liballoc tests Miri ignores, and document why) - #58438 (Use posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np when possible) - #58440 (Whitelist the ARM v6 target-feature) - #58448 (rustdoc: mask `compiler_builtins` docs) - #58468 (split MaybeUninit into several features, expand docs a bit) - #58477 (Fix the syntax error in publish_toolstate.py) - #58479 (compile-pass test for #53606) - #58489 (Fix runtime error in generate-keyword-tests) - #58496 (Fix documentation for std::path::PathBuf::pop) - #58509 (Notify myself when Clippy toolstate changes)
Rollup of 19 pull requests Successful merges: - #57929 (Rustdoc remove old style files) - #57981 (Fix #57730) - #58074 (Stabilize slice_sort_by_cached_key) - #58196 (Add specific feature gate error for const-unstable features) - #58293 (Remove code for updating copyright years in generate-deriving-span-tests) - #58306 (Don't default on std crate when manipulating browser history) - #58359 (librustc_mir: use ? in impl_snapshot_for! macro) - #58395 (Instant::checked_duration_since) - #58429 (fix Box::into_unique effecitvely transmuting to a raw ptr) - #58433 (Update which libcore/liballoc tests Miri ignores, and document why) - #58438 (Use posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np when possible) - #58440 (Whitelist the ARM v6 target-feature) - #58448 (rustdoc: mask `compiler_builtins` docs) - #58468 (split MaybeUninit into several features, expand docs a bit) - #58479 (compile-pass test for #53606) - #58489 (Fix runtime error in generate-keyword-tests) - #58496 (Fix documentation for std::path::PathBuf::pop) - #58509 (Notify myself when Clippy toolstate changes) - #58521 (Fix tracking issue for error iterators)
…mpl-trait, r=zoxc Warning period for detecting nested impl trait Here is some proposed code for making a warning period for the new checking of nested impl trait. It undoes some of the corrective effects of PR #57730, by using boolean flags to track parts of the analysis that were previously skipped prior to PRs #57730 and #57981 landing. Cc #57979
cc #57730
r? @cramertj