I’ve been very interested to see people’s lists of 100 formative/important books recently, so I have now created my own list here.
Some comments about the list:
The ordering of the list reflects the order in which I added the books–I thought about having it alphabetize them, but eventually decided that it was interesting to preserve that order. Roughly that means the ones at the beginning were more obvious choices for me, and therefore more important, but there’s a lot of randomness in there, especially farther down the list. I kept being reminded of books by seeing lists from others, or making connections with other books I read around the same time, or just taking a break and having additional unrelated thoughts about what to add. It’s a bit weirdly embarrassing thinking of this list as a sort of map of my psyche. I’m imagining people reading it and thinking things like, “How could you possibly think of adding Book X before Book Y?” or “Did Bunnicula somehow remind you of The Sound and the Fury? What is wrong with you?” Oh, well. Have fun!
Since this is supposed to be a list of books that were “formative” for me, it’s definitely biased toward things I read early in life. In some cases, I chose them because they are also books I’ve passed on to my daughter, so I now have a new layer of memories overlaid on the originals. There are definitely recent reads on there too–I figure I’m still in the process of being formed even at this late date. The recent ones tend to be books I’ve spent significant time thinking about for whatever reason—Some Desperate Glory because I wrote about it for Yuletide, as an example. Time will tell whether I still think of those as formative books later on. As a sort of test case, I remembered that I had made a (much shorter) list of meaningful books on Facebook long ago—turns out it was 2009. When I looked it up, I found that just about everything on it still appears on my current list. In a few cases I had replaced a book with something different by the same author, and for the rest I’d at least thought about them this time around but ended up deciding against them. So, I’m not too inconsistent at least.
Probably the most obscure/idiosyncratic thing on the list is the National Geographic Picture Atlas of Our Universe. It’s also one of the things that have had the most specific identifiable effect on my life, in that I’m pretty sure it was a contributing factor in putting me on the path of studying physics and astronomy. It was published in the early 80’s, and included what were at the time the most state-of-the-art photos available of Jupiter and Saturn and some of their moons, from the Voyager missions. But the section I remember most clearly is one in which they invented imaginary aliens that would be adapted to live on the other planets in the solar system, with detailed descriptions and artists’ impressions of what they would look like. For example, there were the Plutonian zistles, spiky sea-urchin-looking critters that thrive in super-cold temperatures because they run on superconductivity. When I was trying to find this book for my list, I remembered “Our Universe” from the title, but figured I’d have no luck searching for something so generic-sounding. Then I tried Googling “Plutonian zistles,” and it popped right up with correct book listings. Not only that, but when I went to add it to my 100 books list, I didn’t even have to upload it; it was already in their system. So apparently at least one other person somewhere has also added it to their list.
Omg, as of right now (as I’m writing up this post, before linking to the list from my journal), apparently 25 people have already seen it and voted on how many they’ve read? Amazing. How would they even find it? I clearly have no idea how this list site works.
Anyway, feel free to ask me about any of these in particular, or comment on which ones/how many you’ve read!
Some comments about the list:
The ordering of the list reflects the order in which I added the books–I thought about having it alphabetize them, but eventually decided that it was interesting to preserve that order. Roughly that means the ones at the beginning were more obvious choices for me, and therefore more important, but there’s a lot of randomness in there, especially farther down the list. I kept being reminded of books by seeing lists from others, or making connections with other books I read around the same time, or just taking a break and having additional unrelated thoughts about what to add. It’s a bit weirdly embarrassing thinking of this list as a sort of map of my psyche. I’m imagining people reading it and thinking things like, “How could you possibly think of adding Book X before Book Y?” or “Did Bunnicula somehow remind you of The Sound and the Fury? What is wrong with you?” Oh, well. Have fun!
Since this is supposed to be a list of books that were “formative” for me, it’s definitely biased toward things I read early in life. In some cases, I chose them because they are also books I’ve passed on to my daughter, so I now have a new layer of memories overlaid on the originals. There are definitely recent reads on there too–I figure I’m still in the process of being formed even at this late date. The recent ones tend to be books I’ve spent significant time thinking about for whatever reason—Some Desperate Glory because I wrote about it for Yuletide, as an example. Time will tell whether I still think of those as formative books later on. As a sort of test case, I remembered that I had made a (much shorter) list of meaningful books on Facebook long ago—turns out it was 2009. When I looked it up, I found that just about everything on it still appears on my current list. In a few cases I had replaced a book with something different by the same author, and for the rest I’d at least thought about them this time around but ended up deciding against them. So, I’m not too inconsistent at least.
Probably the most obscure/idiosyncratic thing on the list is the National Geographic Picture Atlas of Our Universe. It’s also one of the things that have had the most specific identifiable effect on my life, in that I’m pretty sure it was a contributing factor in putting me on the path of studying physics and astronomy. It was published in the early 80’s, and included what were at the time the most state-of-the-art photos available of Jupiter and Saturn and some of their moons, from the Voyager missions. But the section I remember most clearly is one in which they invented imaginary aliens that would be adapted to live on the other planets in the solar system, with detailed descriptions and artists’ impressions of what they would look like. For example, there were the Plutonian zistles, spiky sea-urchin-looking critters that thrive in super-cold temperatures because they run on superconductivity. When I was trying to find this book for my list, I remembered “Our Universe” from the title, but figured I’d have no luck searching for something so generic-sounding. Then I tried Googling “Plutonian zistles,” and it popped right up with correct book listings. Not only that, but when I went to add it to my 100 books list, I didn’t even have to upload it; it was already in their system. So apparently at least one other person somewhere has also added it to their list.
Omg, as of right now (as I’m writing up this post, before linking to the list from my journal), apparently 25 people have already seen it and voted on how many they’ve read? Amazing. How would they even find it? I clearly have no idea how this list site works.
Anyway, feel free to ask me about any of these in particular, or comment on which ones/how many you’ve read!
no subject
Date: 2025-04-10 06:45 am (UTC)Probably that should've been on my list, if I had thought to check that it was in there...
Plutonian zistles, spiky sea-urchin-looking critters that thrive in super-cold temperatures because they run on superconductivity.
This approach sounds so charming!
In some cases, I chose them because they are also books I’ve passed on to my daughter, so I now have a new layer of memories overlaid on the originals.
I found that factored a lot into my list as well. Though I definitely prioritized passing down books that were important to me. Which I did not always succeed at, but where they did read the books, the shared experience made them even more important to me.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 12:54 am (UTC)Yeah, I have... not a very good success rate with A, although E will usually read stuff I give her but just reads at a glacially slow pace, so I haven't been able to give her everything I want to :) Although both my kids did read Lord of the Rings and really liked it, so I'll take that as a win!
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 08:52 pm (UTC)I learned the lesson with O and did not try to expose him too early to my favorites, and eventually he got there himself. He read Harry Potter before L did (and then she picked it up from him, instead of me hopefully nudging the books her way at home), and then he read LotR from his class library, which made me really happy, and turned into a pretty consistent urban fantasy reader (I let him read Dresden Files on my Kindle one summer, and he turned into a bigger fan than I am). I'm still trying to get him to pick up some of my other favorite series (Vorkosigan, Dragaera) with zero success (I mean, come on! assassins! space mercenaries! what else should a (at-the-time-)teenage boy want?!), but at least our tastes are fairly congruent.
L EVENTUALLY picked up Good Omens, which I knew she was going to adore, after a high school friend (whose tastes match mine to an uncanny degree) pushed her into it -- and did of course love it. And then finally read some LeGuin in her college class, after ignoring all my recommendations.
But all's well that ends well, I guess?
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 09:53 pm (UTC)In fairness, it does take rather a long time to get to the dragon in The Hobbit! I happened to have a graphic adaptation version of The Hobbit, and I used that with L before embarking on LotR -- I just translated all the speech bubbles / narrative bits into Russian as we went, because we were trying to keep all the read-alouds non-English. So that was OK, and so was a beloved urban fantasy-ish children's book of my childhood (Monday Begins on Saturday), which is three probably novelette-length stories linked together. But LotR and the Harry Potter books beyond the first one or two, when they start getting longer, that was too much for her attention span.
Hopefully you'll be able to go back to The Hobbit and sustain that excitement!
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 11:01 pm (UTC)(I assume not, because that webcomic is very not finished.)
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 11:14 pm (UTC)But thank you for the link to Retelling the Hobbit, because I was unaware of it and it looks AWESOME!
no subject
Date: 2025-04-12 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 09:59 pm (UTC)Ah! I didn't realize you and
Also, ah, that makes sense re: the Cyberiad. I feel like the English-speaking SFF crowd is somewhat familiar with Solaris, but not Lem's shorter, humorous works which I like best. He was translated into Russian a bunch, though, so I read the Cyberiad as a kid, and some Ijon Tichy stories as well. (We recently put on a Ijon Tichy skit for Halloween as part of my parents' annual party/filking tradition.)
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 12:50 am (UTC)It was particularly fun when you had exactly the same cover I remember reading as a kid -- Lion, Witch, and the Wardrobe, The Hero and the Crown, and maybe especially The Dark Is Rising, which is a cover I think is rather bizarre to be honest, but it was the one that I read so I feel attached to it anyway!
no subject
Date: 2025-04-11 09:26 pm (UTC)We definitely had the Scholastic Book Orders in elementary school! That's so cool that you remember the same covers I do. You're right that the Dark is Rising cover is kind of bizarre--I didn't really think about that when selecting it for the list, because it's so familiar to me, but if I were seeing it for the first time I'd definitely be creeped out by it.