longwing: (Default)
[personal profile] longwing
I'd always thought they were a tad crass, not to mention a gigantic "mug me!" sign hanging around the neck of someone you love. But it turns out that there's a much bigger list of reasons that diamond engagement rings are a bad idea. Just thought you'd like to know.

Date: 2007-02-12 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadaria.livejournal.com
Just to offer a point, the last time I read about the movie Blood Diamond in TIME when it came out, is that a lot of the information given in the movie while based on fact is still quite distorted mostly because diamond companies had a problem with it (big surprise there). I think it'd be more accurate to actually look up information on where diamonds come from, who gets them out of the ground and why than to watch a fictional movie.

Also, my ring isn't my mug me sign. My iPod's white head phones do that all ready. Oh and an alternative to the sort of traditional diamond ring would be to purchase an antique ring rather than to get a newer piece. Or to ask where your rocks came from.

Date: 2007-02-12 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] longwing.livejournal.com
The writer of the article was using Blood Diamond as a hook to talk about the larger diamond issues. Most of the article has little to do with the film.

The biggest point made is that it's nearly impossible for someone in the US to get accurate information about their diamond's origins. Most of the pre-debeers tracking information is forged or inaccurate.

My real problem with diamonds is that people spend thousands on something mined by subsistence-miners. All your money goes to Debeers. I avoid other slave-labor products, why would I make an exception for a diamond?

Date: 2007-02-12 11:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kadaria.livejournal.com
>My real problem with diamonds is that people spend thousands on something mined by subsistence-miners. All your money goes to Debeers. I avoid other slave-labor products, why would I make an exception for a diamond?<

I'm not asking you to.

Date: 2007-02-13 12:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] longwing.livejournal.com
Apologies, speaking in hypothetical. :-)

Date: 2007-02-12 08:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leeflower.livejournal.com
yup. That and they're ugly.

That and the idea of giving your fiance/wife jewelry dates back to a time when jewelry was the only thing she could legally own, ergo the only thing she could legally pawn, and was a gesture of love because it was providing her with the means to escape you if you beat her.

That and the average person only spends about one month's salary on engagement rings; DeBeers' two month guideline is more marketing to make people think they're getting a real bargain.

That and diamonds eventually turn into graphite, so really pencils are forever. Write your special lady a poem and be done with it.

If a boy wants to give me a gift, I've got a lengthy list of books I'd like to add to my collection. Computer upgrades are nice too.

Date: 2007-02-12 09:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thelabmonkey.livejournal.com
Kristins is an heirloom, so no problem there :)

Date: 2007-02-14 06:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silver-leaf.livejournal.com
Plus, I think that spending money on real diamonds is just silly, especially when the fake ones (and lots of other options) are just as beautiful if not more beautiful!

Date: 2007-02-15 10:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] longwing.livejournal.com
Heirlooms are heirlooms. You don't throw out an antique desk because 200 years ago they didn't know any better. My complaint is more with the industry than with the tradition.

I want fake diamonds. I want a bag of fake diamonds to use as currency in RPGs. I want diamond coated Dremmel disks.

That would be awesome.

Profile

longwing: (Default)
longwing

August 2010

S M T W T F S
1234 5 67
8910 1112 1314
15161718 192021
22 232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 11:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios