Image

Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Defining a explicit function, without axiom of choice, that is not Lebesgue integrable on any interval?

+0
−0

Context: This example of an everywhere surjective $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$, whose graph has zero Hausdorff measure in its dimension (i.e., the measure is defined on the Borel $\sigma$-algebra), disproves the claim $\left.f\right|_{(c,d)}$ has an undefined expected value.


To change this incorrect assumption, replace $f$ with the function $\mathcal{G}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$. Let $\lambda(\cdot)$ be the Lebesgue measure defined on the Borel $\sigma$-algebra.

Similar to $f$ in the context, we want $\mathcal{G}$ to be non-Lebesgue integrable on any interval.

Question 1: How do we define an explicit $\mathcal{G}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ (without axiom of choice) that satisfies two properties,

  1. The restriction of $\mathcal{G}$ to any interval has infinite area both above and below the $x$-axis.
  2. For all $a\lt b$ and $c \lt d$ real numbers, the set $\{x \in (a,b):\mathcal{G}(x) \in (c,d)\}$ has a positive Lebesgue measure?
History

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

I got this response from this PhD student:

Such functions exist; indeed, let $(q_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ be a numbering of the rational numbers and $k_n=2^{2^n}$, and define functions $f_n$ as follows:

If $f_0=0$ everywhere and:

$$\small f_{n+1}(x)=\begin{cases} q_{n/2} & x\in(q_j-1/k_n,q_j+1/k_n), j=1,\cdots,n, n \text{ is even}\\ k_n^2 & x \in(q_j-1/k_n,q_j+1/k_n), j=1,\cdots,n, n \text{ is odd}\\ f_n(x) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$

each $f_{n+1}$ agrees with $f_n$ at all real numbers except a set of measure $<1/2^n$ for big $n$, so you can consider let $\mathcal{G}$ be the pointwise limit of the functions $f_n$, which is defined everywhere except measure $0$ (in those bad points just define $\mathcal{G}=0$). The resulting function satisfies both conditions 1. and 2. above in the OP.

History

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »