schemingreader: (Default)
[personal profile] schemingreader
We were discussing Adrienne Rich, a famous poet whose work some on my flist don't like, and some do. I do like her work, but more than that I like her.

[livejournal.com profile] mechiaeh mentioned in passing that Harold Bloom had slammed Rich for her choices for the Best American Poetry. [livejournal.com profile] busaikko said that she didn't know that the world of poetry was so scandal-ridden.

I said I would post links to a bigger poetry scandal my husband told me about. He did an MFA in Creative Writing in the early 1990s and so is kind of tapped in to the whole poetry scene.

Link to article in Chronicle of Higher Education about Alan Cordle, a man on a mission to expose corruption in poetry contests. Here is a link to a page on Cordle's website about poet Jorie Graham. Here is his watchdog page about fradulent contests. Several have quietly changed their rules to avoid the appearance of cronyism.

Obviously, this guy has a total axe to grind. But it is a scandal.

Oh, but you know, this is just corruption. The other kind of scandal, the bad blood-feuding kind, is ever present.

Hope you find this interesting and not merely sordid!

Date: 2006-06-11 05:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rexluscus.livejournal.com
Fuckin' Harold Bloom. He's always slamming everybody for everything. That guy needs to shut the fuck up and realize his cultural moment passed by about thirty years ago.

On the other hand, I hear on a personal level he's actually a rather sweet guy.

Date: 2006-06-11 06:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rexluscus.livejournal.com
Geez, I just read that article. What a sad situation. It sounds like everybody got fucked, even the guy who started it. What a train wreck.

Date: 2006-06-11 08:37 am (UTC)
busaikko: Something Wicked This Way Comes (Default)
From: [personal profile] busaikko
Goodness! I am reminded of that classic mommie phrase, 'It's all fun and games until somebody pokes an eye out.' Or gets outed as a poetry vigilante. Funny old world we live in....

Date: 2006-06-11 11:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schemingreader.livejournal.com
Or gets outed for giving her lover and then husband a poetry prize. After giving prizes consistently to former students, of course.

Date: 2006-06-11 11:43 am (UTC)
busaikko: Something Wicked This Way Comes (Default)
From: [personal profile] busaikko
I do see the 'small-world' problem, in that there can't be that many poets in academia. They probably are a fairly incestuous group, who all know each other from professional gatherings, orgies, and what have you. Poetry judging is likely very subjective, so a teacher would be more likely to favour students who learnt her lessons well. I can see that. Not that that makes it right, of course, or fair.

I am forced to wonder now how many poems were generated by all this fuss.

The worth of a poem, it is true,
depended on which judges you knew:
did they sleep in your bed?
did you do as they said?
If so, well then--you jump the queue!

Date: 2006-06-11 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schemingreader.livejournal.com
I just feel some resentment about this, for the same reason as the fellow who started the website. I'm the partner of a poet who was good enough to go to a prestigious MFA program. I don't like thinking that publication and contests and stuff are rigged.

It might be true that the world of academic poetry is small, but it's not small because there aren't very many good poets.

Date: 2006-06-11 01:44 pm (UTC)
busaikko: Something Wicked This Way Comes (Default)
From: [personal profile] busaikko
It might be true that the world of academic poetry is small, but it's not small because there aren't very many good poets.

Is there any kind of popular upsurge in reaction to the Foetry revelations, along the lines of freeing contests and publications from the corrupt hands of their current managers? New contests or anthologies or what have you? It seems like a good opportunity to start up a kind of underground poetry movement.... I'd join if I were a poet but (see above)... no.

Date: 2006-06-11 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
SFWA (the Science Fiction Writers of America) has some fabulous links at the "Writer Beware" section of their web site to help aspiring writers navigate the minefield of fradulent agents and literary agencies. www.sfwa.org.

And alas...I'm not crazy about Adrienne Rich. I think I was permanently scarred by a dreadful graduation speech at Smith (not to my class) where she urged the graduates to "tap into the tribal anger of our Ibo grandmothers." I was floored by the cultural imperialism of the statement, and by the overall tone of the speech ("it's right because you feel it" school of feminism). I know I'm very much in the minority, but there you have it...:)

OTOH, Harold Bloom is a pompous asshole and always has been. It's enough to make me go out and buy the anthology just to spite Bloom, who is one of those critics who has power right now and is going to be completely forgotten ten years after he's dead.

Date: 2006-06-11 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schemingreader.livejournal.com
You aren't in the minority! I bet if I surveyed my flist, it would be about 50-50, people who like and don't like Rich.

The thing about the Foetry site is that these are contests and institutions with a lot of credibility. It's not like someone sends you a postcard for a vanity press and you pay them to publish. This is like, the Iowa Writers Workshop has a contest and only gives prizes for a few years to Iowa workshop grads. Or, in the case of Jorie Graham, the person is at Harvard. He listed the Yale Younger Poets series! I found that pretty shocking.

Date: 2006-06-11 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellid.livejournal.com
I was surprised to see some of the names on that list. Then again, academic poetry is a very small world. I wonder if these contests are judged blind?

Date: 2006-06-11 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schemingreader.livejournal.com
Well, I think some of them have changed their rules because of the scrutiny. It seems like until now that the poets submitting work didn't know who the judges were, but the judges knew whose work they were judging...

unless it's all a coincidence and the judges just prefer work that has the stamp of their influence on it!

Profile

schemingreader: (Default)
schemingreader

January 2014

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
1920212223 2425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 07:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios