No Masa

Sep. 1st, 2026 01:00 pm
madbaker: (Default)
[personal profile] madbaker
This week's Bonus Resolution Recipe: Strawberry Buttermilk Corn Cake.
Or, the continuing storrrrry of what do with all that masa.
Read more... )
madbaker: (Paul the Samurai)
[personal profile] madbaker
This week's Resolution Recipe: Galician Rye Bread.
"One doesn't think of Spain as rye country, but this traditional boule from Galicia in the northwest uses an extremely wet dough and long ferment that produce this flavorful, open-crumbed bread."
Read more... )
*To the Spaniards, the full, round loaf, topped with a spherical knot of dough, resembles a female breast, earning it the name moña - female mannequin.

Worldcon Interim Report

Aug. 29th, 2026 08:34 am
hrj: (Default)
[personal profile] hrj
Worldcon is being enjoyable. It's hot and humid, which mostly is only a factor when walking between the Hilton (my hotel and the hotel where some programming is located) and the convention center (where most of the programming and the dealers/art/displays are). I packed assuming excess air conditioning, which is a successful tactic when I'm indoors, but less so when walking between, going to offsite food, or hanging out in the large "lanai" courtyard around which the room parties are arranged. I don't know that I'll wear all the nicer outfits I brought, but I'll wear some of them.

My original hotel roommate cancelled at the last minute due to life complications, but I was able to pick up a replacement who had originally been planning to commute and was finding that sub-optimal.

The online "Introverting at conventions" panel went well.

My reading was thinly attended (two people who came specifically for it and 2-3 who stayed over from the previous reading) but since it was scheduled in early evening I'm not surprised. What does surprise/confuse me is how my readings (in general, not just this one) often seem to attract a majority-male audience. Not exactly who I think I'm targeting. Don't get me wrong -- I'm delighted with my male fans. But it makes me wonder if I'm doing something wrong with respect to my female fans.

I regularly dither over whether to sign up for an autographing session. It's useful for letting people know I'll be in a specific place/time to say hi, but let's be honest, I'm a c-list author, which is why I get scheduled for a 9am slot. But a friend dropped by to chat and stayed for he whole hour, and a couple other people dropped by. One was collecting signatures in an autograph album and also accepted one of my free chapbooks. The other was a random guy who ended up buying a copy of Related-ivity! (I've hand-sold three copies so far and a fourth is spoken for when we connect. Another person will be hunting down one of the copies at Larry Smith Books. So I'm doing rather well on that end.)

My online table talk (kaffeeklatsch, whatever) was cancelled due to no one signing up. I can't say I'm entirely surprised, but I am disappointed.

Otherwise, socializing has been enjoyable. The in-house dining options are friendly for casual connections. I got take-out for yesterday dinner and sat at a table in the lanai courtyard that turned into an energetic full-table conversation on everything from quantum physics to linguistics.

Today I have two in-person panels and will be daring to over-dress a little in honor of that.

(no subject)

Aug. 28th, 2026 12:03 pm
madbaker: (mammoth garlic)
[personal profile] madbaker
Yesterday I took the day off. It was originally going to be a half day, but I needed a break. We drove to the East Bay (traffic was awful, a lane was shut down on the Bay Bridge) and met Ken & CJ at the local theater. After obligatory 30 minutes of inane previews we saw Coyote vs Acme. It was good; lots of nods to classic Looney Tunes. Not ground-breaking like Roger Rabbit but at least it wasn't a pathetic commercial like Space Jam. I'd recommend it.

We walked around for a bit and had a decent dinner at a hole-in-the-wall Salvadorean place. Then home, in the obligatory rush hour traffic.
siderea: (Default)
[personal profile] siderea
A long-time reader asked if I have any wisdom to share about getting one's first set of hearing aids, and I don't. Maybe some of you do?

He just had a hearing test showing hearing loss – almost perfectly the same in both ears, IIRC starting around 1000 Hz and tanking in a straight line on the audiogram as pitch rises – so he's been referred to an audiologist consult on hearing aids. He'd like to know more about whatever there is to know about hearing aids before talking with someone with a financial interest in selling him something. Definitely interested to hear from any hearing aid users who have strong and informed opinions about the market.

Also – this being the US – he's still working and has excellent health insurance coverage for hearing aids through his present employer, but hopes to retire in about a year, at which point he'll be on Medicare, and doesn't know how good his hearing aid coverage will be. So if there are decisions to be made that might make the most of his present insurance situation, he'd like to know about it.

I also have some questions of my own. I was surprised to learn that standard hearing tests don't go below 250 Hz and go up to 8000 Hz, and the justification is that that covers the range of human speech. Which:

1) The hell it does? You know what 250 Hz is? Middle C on a bad day in the Baroque. That is: a slightly sharp B3 under A440 tuning. Middle C is so-called because it is in the middle of human sung vocal production ranges, where below it is the bass clef, traditionally for men's voices, and above it is treble clef, traditionally for women's and boy's voices. The standard audiogram starts above any note a bass singer ever typically sings, and above 2/3rds of what tenors sing.

1a) Worse, sung vocal production is usually (always?) higher than spoken vocal production in the same person – that is, speech is lower than song. According to this at VoiceScience.org, the typical men's speaking range is ~93–135 Hz with a mean of ~116 Hz and the typical women's speaking range is ~162–238 Hz with a mean of ~205 Hz. There are no human beings whose speech production pitch range is typically above 250 hz. A hearing test that starts at 250 Hz and goes up starts higher than the entirety of typical human speech production, all genders.

2) The C above middle C is only 523 Hz. Who talks at 8000 Hz? Dolphins? Bats? Hell, 1000 Hz is just under the second C above middle C.

3) You know what's even lower than human speech? Traffic. Garbage disposals. Engines. Thunder. Rushing water. Tornadoes. Why are we pretending to only care about hearing correction for understanding human speech when hearing is also necessary for safety, and the pitches of things you might want to hear in the environment can be low?

4) No, really, they triaged everything below middle C? Like fuck music entirely? Doesn't matter if you can enjoy a rock band or a symphony orchestra any more, that's not a medical problem?

Is there some way any of this makes any sense? This all seems completely insane to me.

I had a hearing test back in 2005 because I noticed I was having trouble parsing speech at my internship. I got an audiogram, but at the time I didn't even notice what the starting pitch on the chart was. I was told that my hearing was fine – better than average for my age, actually – and that it showed no reason I would be having trouble. But in retrospect, they... never actually tested my hearing in the range of speech? WTH?

ETA: A picture's worth a thousand pitches. Here's my understanding of the situation:

Ranges of speech, song, and audiograms vs piano keyboard

Note that the ranges I specified for sung voice types is the typical choral expectations; virtuousic soloists can and are often expected to exceed these.
hrj: (Default)
[personal profile] hrj
Official release day today. Here's the universal book link page: https://books2read.com/b/31zplW

I'm still working on getting more links added. The page was being picky about me adding links manually the last time I tried, so I guessed it might be an issue with the book not being live yet and decided to wait to try again. But it's released through Draft2Digital and has a paperback through Ingram, so it should be available through all the standard outlets.

It's funny: My first two commercial self-publishing projects have both been ones where I'm not counting on actual commercial success. Skin-Singer both because story collections are tricky and because the majority of the contents are previously published. The Theory of Related-ivity because it's an extremely niche interest. This takes a lot of pressure off worrying about how well they'll sell, but it also means I don't have a good metric for what to expect with an actual first-release novel. (We're a long way away from anything like that happening, because the top priority for novels is the next Alpennia book, which I assume will be a Bella release.)

When I was first working on Related-ivity, I wasn't necessarily thinking about publishing it as a book, just as the blog series. But as it got longer, as the footnotes became a more significant part of it, and as I thought about how ephemeral attention to blogs are, I pretty much thought "why not?" Also, since D2D now has an annual threshold requirement for income to avoid the "maintenance fee" they added (to fight AI publications), every little bit of income helps. I didn't make the threshold this year, but maybe next year? I really need to promote Skin-Singer more online. It sells well at in-person events but I'm really bad about doing online promotions.

Pie-Eyed

Aug. 24th, 2026 12:52 pm
madbaker: (Paul the Samurai)
[personal profile] madbaker
This week's Resolution Recipe: Favorite Apple Pie.
"This apple pie isn't one that will make you sit up and take notice. Instead, it will invite you to snuggle into your favorite chair, heave a comfortable sigh, and enjoy bite after bite of this perfectly simple treat."
YMMV )

Physical Therapy TV

Aug. 22nd, 2026 12:52 pm
hrj: (Default)
[personal profile] hrj
When I'm doing the PT sessions with my Medieval Torture Devices, it's absolutely essential that I be able to distract myself with tv, so I've been finding new shows to binge that have episodes in the 30-60 minute range. (The total PT takes about 90 minutes. I don't want to get involved in a movie, but I'm ok with hanging out to watch the end of an episode.)

I'm currently subscribed to BritBox which has been offering up some fun mystery series. My latest binge was "Hamish MacBeth" which had a delightful blend of humor, light fantasy (in the "could be coincidence" vein) and the occasional tear-jerker.

Currently I'm watching a show on Apple TV that isn't in my usual wheelhouse, but has the hope of being angry-satisfying (in a "fantasy of justice" sort of way) as well as having a complex time-braided storyline of a sort that I find fun to watch. "Bad Sisters" could easily be triggering to some, because it focuses on a group of sisters trying to dispose of an extremely toxic, emotionally abusive, manipulative brother-in-law. It's comedy, while also being an uncannily solid portrait of a particular type of personality. The type you want to punch repeatedly in the face. Or maybe murder. Which is the point of the show. In the process there are comedic hijinks, hilarious screw-ups, and the sort of embarrassment you get when everyone has personal secrets and will do almost anything to avoid having honest heart-to-heart conversations with their nearest and dearest. It's a very weird show. There aren't really good guys but there's one very very bad guy, and since the show opens at his funeral it's easier to make it through all the awful things he does in the flashbacks.

Weekend projects

Aug. 22nd, 2026 11:48 am
madbaker: (Saluminati)
[personal profile] madbaker
  • Sourdough popovers (done)
  • bills & stuff
  • resurrect Lazarus IV (rye starter) (in process)
  • stuff and smoke a batch of 1500s garlic chorizo for curing (in process)
  • bananana bread
  • kale gratin
  • decide if a British Museum membership is worth it to help get Big Lie tickets in January
This may be a trifle ambitious, but I have to keep pace with the wife.  She has been triaging/sorting/cleaning like a mad thing and is also working on beautifying our back yard.  (Not a euphemism.)

Also, my sourdough starter is The Oobleck in a nod to Dr. Seuss.  Since the apprentice brought a clone of his starter, I have named it the OoBrokk.

Internet Back!

Aug. 19th, 2026 05:04 pm
hrj: (Default)
[personal profile] hrj
Getting my new internet equipment set up was both simpler and more annoying than expected. Here's a brief tour.

Equipment showed up late Monday

Decided to do my usual bike/coffee-shop routine (flanked by PT) so it was late afternoon before I began the set-up process. Per instructions, downloaded the "smart home" app and logged in to my ATT account.

The set-up instructions claim the app will provide you an "install equipment" button which will then lead you through the process. The "install equipment" button briefly flashes on screen as the app automatically logs you in and then is no longer visible or accessible. A search through every menu in the app fails to find any other method of getting the set-up instructions.

I called the "dedicated help line for ATT Internet Air" that was provided to me on my service call a week ago. The number is no longer in service and re-directs to the regular service phone number. That number offers a call-back appointment the next day. I hang up.

Now we're up to today. First thing, I called the ATT service number. "Call volume is unusually high, but we can give you a call-back in 15 minutes." OK. I have my phone and headset standing by. The call-back appears on my Apple Watch and I hit "accept". I can hear the ATT agent talking but evidently she can't hear me through the watch. She hangs up. I call service once more at they project a 10 minute wait time. I stay on the line this time.

I manage to short-circuit being told to do the set-up things that I already know won't work and describe my process history to the agent. He says, "Oh, it's just plug-and-play, there's no special process." Evidently the special installation instructions which have to do with verifying the optimal location in your house for the device are mostly unnecessary. We stay on the line while I plug in the device and verify that it's worki...oops. Got a signal then lost it. Reboot.

This time I got as far as logging in to the network on my laptop. Worked fine for about 5 minutes, then as we were moving on to the "register your device" step, the connection was lost again. Reset. No further drop-outs. Started the process to register my device (so it shows up in my ATT account) but -- as I eventually figured out -- every step in the online process has a lag time of about half a minute from pushing a button to getting to the next screen. By the time I figured this out and completed the process, I had let the agent go (after almost an hour on line). Did finally manage to register my device.

The next step is to change the new device's name and password to the ones I'd used for my old device. This will enable all my connected devices to switch over without the need for a new log-in. This actually worked as promised. Yay.

I still haven't placed my new device in its final location. At the moment it's standing in front of my tv, which is suboptimal. The instructions suggest that being behind an appliance can interfere with the signal, but I may try that anyway, since there's plenty of room behind the tv.

I have a different idea for a final state. My media center is an electronics cabinet with the big screen tv on top of it, flanked by two tall IKEA cabinets. I've been thinking for some time about using the space above the tv by installing a shelf between the cabinets. One thought has been to move my book "brag shelf" there, rather than being on the mantle over the fireplace. It would also be an optimal location for the internet device. Today I went off window-shopping for a shelf solution that would fit the space. There's room for a 24x48" shelf above the tv. (I wouldn't want one that doesn't go the full depth because that would ensure that things would fall off the back side.) But I'm not excited about supporting it with brackets that screw into the sides of the standing cabinets. I don't know how well they'd stand up to it. What I envision would be some sort of support structure shaped like this:

__ __
| |
|________|

that would rest on top of the tall cabinets (so I don't have to drill holes in them) with the shelf sitting on top of it. But this feels like it would involve metal fabrication. Alternately, perhaps a structure with horizontal beams across the top of the cabinets and three U shaped supports coming down from it. Like this;
_________________
| | |
|_____|_____|

Maybe I could do some nice woodwork on the visible side. Make use of all those power tools I have lying around. But as I was window-shopping possibilities, it occurred to me that I don't want to start any of this until I have full use of my hands again. So there's plenty of time to do more design work.

Profile

threadwalker: (Default)
threadwalker

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 2nd, 2026 05:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios