We are all learning here, so I’m in no position to tell you how you should write and review your code.
What I can tell you is what's working for the people I work with and me.
We aren't manually reading the code anymore. We don't care about individual lines. We don't have
How about:
"I recognized human review as the bottleneck, and used the lift of agentic engineering to build the guardrails and verification mechanisms which render it unnecessary (as well as that perfect is subjective and forever the enemy of good enough, even in software). "
People who say:
"I never review the code my AI agent writes"
Do you mean:
"I used to review it, but it was perfect every time, so now I trust it so much that I don't need to"
Or:
"The code is difficult to review and I lowered / removed my standards in order to move faster"
LinkedIn posting for the first time ever, but the fact that (a) we have a distant network in common and (b) the hiring manager read about a @laravel contribution I made in @laravelnews hours before receiving my resume (and appreciated the @coderabbi branding) certain didn't hurt.