Tag management #8104
-
It would be nice if there was a place in the CP where we could manage all of the existing tags. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 26 comments 10 replies
-
This needs to be part of core! Doesn't seem difficult to implement either, and it seems like an awfully common issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Bob Olde Hampsink plugin is perfect. Buy him a few cocktail and roll it in! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Alternatively, maybe Tags should just become a plugin and not part of Core. It feels like it hasn't been given much love right now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'd go further and say we need more control over tags (similar to user relations and blocks "limit" box) : http://bit.ly/1VqvlIJ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As long as this isn't part of Craft's core (yet), there is a Tag Manager plugin here https://github.com/boboldehampsink/tagmanager |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Would love to see this become part of core! For now we're going to try to get Tag Manager to work with Craft 3. Has anyone had any luck with that? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@whoisgina I don’t think @boboldehampsink has ported it to Craft 3 yet (not listed on https://github.com/craftcms/plugins). Maybe he’s hoping we’ll add it to Craft ourselves 🙃 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'd love to see this happen – it's the only missing feature in Craft for my usecase. The plugin above is deprecated now so currently the only way I can edit a tag (which we're using as "authors" for a blogpost entry type) is to find a blog written by that author, and double click their name in the tag list. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm hoping you'll add it to Craft yourselves, FWIW 🙃 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We’re going to add it in a 3.x release, but not sure exactly when yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I hope it will be soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ether Creative just released a new tag management plugin: https://github.com/ethercreative/tags Should work well while you wait for a built-in solution. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ether's plugin hasn't been updated in 6 months and issues go unanswered. Tag management in Core would very much be appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is this being worked on? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No, the plan is to do away with Tags and Categories entirely, merging those concepts with Entries (and giving Entires field all the same features that Tags and Categories fields have currently). Plus make the Entries index page more customizable so you can still present certain sections as “categories” or “tags” if you want. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm fine with that. Been using Categories to manage tags for a while and it's been working good, and honestly like Brandon said Categories are basically just channel-type sections anyway with slight UI differences. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@brandonkelly |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Giving Entries fields the ability have similar UIs as Categories and Tags fields is the main thing I meant by that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@brandonkelly , so if i use tag field in a custom element type to label those custom elements -and this custom element type is not about entries at all-, can i do the same thing and tag my custom elements with entries field in future? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@vnali Yes, there won’t be any authoring feature regressions with this change. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@brandonkelly any news on this? Are these plans for v3.x or v4.x? And will there be a way to create new tags directly from within the field like we can now? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@Friksel We’ve started planning it out a bit, but no news yet. Yes, part of the plan will be to add new UI modes to Entries fields, so they can behave like Tags/Categories fields do currently. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Did anything come from this? We have a client who has 2 tags they want to remove - currently I think it's a bit much to install a plugin to remove the 2 tags |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I see that Brandon, you have added a command for Craft, but our clients aren't technically savvy and should be able to manage the tags of their own CMS. That's our main selling point to our clients for Craft CMS, we build it, and they control it. Currently, we are only able to add tags if it's been attached to a field, which is rather funny (but annoying to our clients) – and we can't edit or delete any within the admin. It would be most ideal if once a tags group was created, the admin sidebar would have a "Tags" option, once clicked you could select the tag group and see all the tags entered within it. It would be ideal to be CRUD said tags in this view, like the old deprecated plugin used to. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just a bump on this — I'm working on my first Craft project and it's surprising to me that Tags have been given such short shrift in the control panel. Tags are no longer as important as they once were, but they're still very useful, especially for organizing editorial collections of content. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We have decided to officially retire the concept of tags (and categories and global sets) in Craft 5. Here’s an extended explanation of how that will play out: #9781 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
We have decided to officially retire the concept of tags (and categories and global sets) in Craft 5. Here’s an extended explanation of how that will play out: #9781 (comment)