I've gotten feedback regarding the fact that ld was a misleading name for this package several times from colleagues and I tend to agree. While I was trying to provide a short name for people to easily identify, it doesn't provide information regarding its purpose (much like a badly named variable).
I want the name distro.. but apparently it's already taken by another initial implementation of the same functionality.
Maybe "dist" as a name for this instead as it will be natural to write:
import dist
dist.id()
dist.info()
...
thoughts?
I've gotten feedback regarding the fact that
ldwas a misleading name for this package several times from colleagues and I tend to agree. While I was trying to provide a short name for people to easily identify, it doesn't provide information regarding its purpose (much like a badly named variable).I want the name distro.. but apparently it's already taken by another initial implementation of the same functionality.
Maybe "dist" as a name for this instead as it will be natural to write:
thoughts?