Since https://github.com/hgrecco/pint is using a vendored copy of flexparser taken from somewhere around 49e5c11, with a number of changes not in the 0.1 release, is a 0.2 release planned any time soon?
In Fedora Linux, we’d rather de-vendor flexparser and use an external copy as part of a general policy of avoiding bundled libraries except under certain conditions. This is pretty easy to do, but it would be nice if the packaged flexparser could be a tagged/stable release rather than a pre-release snapshot. I understand, though, that the vendored copy in pint works, and from your perspective this isn’t a problem or something you need to do anything about.
Since https://github.com/hgrecco/pint is using a vendored copy of
flexparsertaken from somewhere around 49e5c11, with a number of changes not in the 0.1 release, is a 0.2 release planned any time soon?In Fedora Linux, we’d rather de-vendor
flexparserand use an external copy as part of a general policy of avoiding bundled libraries except under certain conditions. This is pretty easy to do, but it would be nice if the packagedflexparsercould be a tagged/stable release rather than a pre-release snapshot. I understand, though, that the vendored copy inpintworks, and from your perspective this isn’t a problem or something you need to do anything about.