[perf] tiny fulfillment loop - #160296
Conversation
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
[perf] tiny fulfillment loop
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (c1c58e0): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf. @bors rollup=never rustc-perf Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 0.5%, secondary 1.6%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 0.9%, secondary -0.9%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeResults (primary -0.1%, secondary -0.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Bootstrap: 492.106s -> 493.116s (0.21%) |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #160479) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts by rebasing. |
let's see perrrrrf
r? ghost