Core CPI next week is expected to be 2.5%. At historic norms, PCE would be ~2.1%. The inverted relationship is largely measurement error (PM services, software).
The jobs data show what I feared: we should not ask people to lose their jobs to offset inflation measurement error.
Citizen of the United States of America 🇺🇸
New York
Joined March 2018
- A hypothesis: the increase in real interest rates has nothing to do with fiscal policy, inflation or monetary policy and everything to do with the decline in free cash flow in the tech sector and the accompanying swing in national savings. If so, policy implications are nuanced.
- There are two issues: 1. Somethings are just outside almost all econ models like defense and natsec, and people give policy prescriptions based on models without these 2. Even within econ, most models require a nonexplosive net foreign asset position, or at minimum one thatIs it fair to say that a fair amount of the political, security, media, business, and academic establishment have basically come around to Peter Navarro (a guy who was dismissed as a complete crank 10 years ago) Thought?
- I said on @SquawkCNBC I have a hard time imagining what reaction function says "hold last meeting, then a marginally negative core CPI print is what puts us over the edge to hike." Tough to find a plausible mapping of data to policy rates giving both a June hold and a July hikeFormer Fed Governor @SteveMiran: the Fed should stand pat when it decides on rates tomorrow. cnb.cx/4hktWW7
- Great piece by @bhgreeley on monetarism's gradual comeback. The literature that's built up over the last decade is impressive. I suspect we will see Chairman Warsh increasingly refer to monetary aggregates as time goes on. ft.com/content/6633c4… via @FT





