Another way to know weak arguments is when folks continue shifting their point without acknowledging it.
And empirically, the point they eventually anchor on is the most polarizing one because the goal isn’t to make a good argument, it’s to get attention.
My takeaway is that many people don’t actually know how to articulate themselves. I see words being used that mean a certain thing, but the conclusion the poster arrives at with the words makes no sense.
A lot of the arguments have poor premises. And people are generalizing to
My takeaway is that many people don’t actually know how to articulate themselves. I see words being used that mean a certain thing, but the conclusion the poster arrives at with the words makes no sense.
A lot of the arguments have poor premises. And people are generalizing to
My takeaway is that many people don’t actually know how to articulate themselves. I see words being used that mean a certain thing, but the conclusion the poster arrives at with the words makes no sense.
A lot of the arguments have poor premises. And people are generalizing to
This tweet argues the following:
1. Nigerian employers don’t contribute anything to the talent ecosystem except complaints.
2. Because of 1, Nigerian employers are bottom barrel.
3. Because of 2, drag the Moniepoint CEO.
4. 3 assumes the Moniepoint CEO is bottom barrel
I need them to drag that moniepoint CEO well because naija employers are bottom barrel, they don't contribute anything to the talent ecosystem except complaints.