1. X
  2. TrueFoundry
Log inSign up
TrueFoundry
336 posts
Image
user avatar
TrueFoundry
@truefoundry
TrueFoundry is a unified platform with an enterprise-grade AI Gateway - combining LLM, MCP, and Agent Gateway to securely manage, route, and govern AI workloads
San Francisco
truefoundry.com
Joined April 2022
50
Following
646
Followers
RepliesRepliesMediaMedia

Log in or sign up for X

See what’s happening and join the conversation

Continue with phone
or
Log in with username or email
Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    TrueFoundry
    @truefoundry
    Jun 8
    The worst advice for enterprise AI agents? Start small. "Start small" sounds safe. In reality, it often leaves enterprises with 100+ agent pilots and no scalable AI strategy. The winners do the opposite: → Start with a high-value problem → Build the foundation → Scale from
    Image
    00:00
    1.2K
  • user avatar
    TrueFoundry
    @truefoundry
    2h
    @truefoundry now integrates with @GraySwanAI . Teams building LLM applications and agents can now enforce Gray Swan Cygnal security policies through the TrueFoundry AI Gateway. Detect prompt injections, jailbreaks, harmful content, and custom policy violations inline across
    Image
    Made with AI
    45
  • user avatar
    TrueFoundry
    @truefoundry
    Jul 24
    @truefoundry now integrates with @ringg_ai . Teams building AI voice applications and agents can now route speech-to-text (STT) requests through the TrueFoundry AI Gateway to Ringg AI using a unified OpenAI-compatible interface without changing application code. Organizations
    Image
    Made with AI
    979
  • user avatar
    TrueFoundry
    @truefoundry
    Jul 24
    OpenAI's GPT-5.6 pricing quietly added a cost to caching: cache writes now run 1.25x normal input price. We modeled the break-even point, and it's the same across Sol, Terra, and Luna: writes can be up to 78.3% of requests before caching stops saving you money. Read the full
    94
  • user avatar
    TrueFoundry
    @truefoundry
    Jul 24
    We ran GLM 5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8 on tasks built to expose the gap. Quality: tied. The real gap wasn't intelligence, it was tokenizers: a 1M-token doc hard-failed Opus's context window but GLM handled it fine. GLM's also ~4x cheaper, with spiky latency on hard tasks. Read the
    279
  • See @truefoundry's full profile

    Sign up
    Log in
Advertisement
Advertisement