Upgrade to oss-parent 9 - #2149
Conversation
org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:7 is unsigned (missing .asc files), which forces users of gson library that enforce signature verification to explicitly allowlist oss-parent. Luckily oss-parent 9 is signed, thus fixing this issue. See: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/7/ vs https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/9/
|
This looks like a good change, but for the long term, it would be best to move away from oss-parent as it is deprecated and might not work correctly anymore. |
I think that seems to be a fine thing to do, but I would prefer it is done in a separate step :) |
|
Thanks! I agree that ultimately we should get rid of oss-parent. I may try that before the next release, since I think the main impact is on releasing. |
|
Getting rid of oss-parent would be really good. It appears at the moment it apparently effectively downgrades certain plugins during release, which seems to be the reason why the published Javadoc has no external links to the JDK classes. The following is logged:
Notice the |
org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:7 is unsigned (missing .asc files), which forces users of gson library
that enforce signature verification to explicitly allowlist oss-parent. Luckily oss-parent 9 is signed,
thus fixing this issue.
See:
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/7/
vs
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/9/