feat: offline with git submodule

[QiChenX]

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
  feature

• What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
  docker image for developers to build openmldb from scratch without internet for native codes #3760
  manage rapidjson directly using git submodule

• What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
  bundle rapidjson & farmhash directly in source code, allowing users to compile OpenMLDB offline

[aceforeverd]

requires #3778

[github-actions]

SDK Test Report

101 files  ±0  101 suites  ±0   2m 4s ⏱️ -4s
345 tests ±0  331 ✅ ±0  14 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
471 runs  ±0  457 ✅ ±0  14 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit a8413c8. ± Comparison against base commit c2e77b2.

This pull request removes 30 and adds 9 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

  PARTITION BY db1.t1.col2 ORDER BY db1.t1.col1
  PARTITION BY t1.col2 ORDER BY t1.col1
  ROWS_RANGE BETWEEN 3 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
 ) limit 10;](1)
 ) limit 10;](2)
 ) limit 10;](3)
 FROM db1.t1
 FROM t1
 WINDOW w1 AS (
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
…

com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlLastJoinWithMultipleDB[,  SELECT sum(db1.t1.col1) over w1 as sum_t1_col1, db2.t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM db1.t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on db1.t1.col1 = db2.t2.col1 and db1.t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0
 WINDOW w1 AS (
  PARTITION BY db1.t1.col2 ORDER BY db1.t1.col1
  ROWS_RANGE BETWEEN 3 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
 ) limit 10;](2)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlLastJoinWithMultipleDB[db1,  SELECT sum(t1.col1) over w1 as sum_t1_col1, db2.t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on t1.col1 = db2.t2.col1 and t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0
 WINDOW w1 AS (
  PARTITION BY t1.col2 ORDER BY t1.col1
  ROWS_RANGE BETWEEN 3 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
 ) limit 10;](1)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlLastJoinWithMultipleDB[null,  SELECT sum(db1.t1.col1) over w1 as sum_t1_col1, db2.t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM db1.t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on db1.t1.col1 = db2.t2.col1 and db1.t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0
 WINDOW w1 AS (
  PARTITION BY db1.t1.col2 ORDER BY db1.t1.col1
  ROWS_RANGE BETWEEN 3 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
 ) limit 10;](3)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlMultipleDBErrorTest[, SELECT db2.t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on t1.col1 = db2.t2.col1 and t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0;
, SQL parse error: Fail to transform data provider op: table t1 not exists in database []](4)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlMultipleDBErrorTest[db1, SELECT db1.t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on t1.col1 = db2.t2.col1 and t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0;
, SQL parse error: Column Not found: db1.t2.str1](2)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlMultipleDBErrorTest[db1, SELECT db2.t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on t1.col1 = t2.col1 and t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0;
, SQL parse error: Column Not found: .t2.col1](3)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlMultipleDBErrorTest[db1, SELECT t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on t1.col1 = db2.t2.col1 and t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0;
, SQL parse error: Column Not found: .t2.str1](1)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlMultipleDBErrorTest[null, SELECT db2.t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM t1
 last join db2.t2 order by db2.t2.col1
 on t1.col1 = db2.t2.col1 and t1.col2 = db2.t2.col0;
, SQL parse error: Fail to transform data provider op: table t1 not exists in database []](5)
com._4paradigm.hybridse.sdk.SqlEngineTest ‑ sqlWindowLastJoin[ SELECT sum(t1.col1) over w1 as sum_t1_col1, t2.str1 as t2_str1
 FROM t1
 last join t2 order by t2.col1
 on t1.col1 = t2.col1 and t1.col2 = t2.col0
 WINDOW w1 AS (
  PARTITION BY t1.col2 ORDER BY t1.col1
  ROWS_RANGE BETWEEN 3 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
 ) limit 10;](1)

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Linux Test Report

0 files   -  53  0 suites   - 60   0s ⏱️ - 27m 15s
0 tests  - 669  0 ✅  - 661  0 💤  - 7  0 ❌  - 1 
0 runs   - 670  0 ✅  - 662  0 💤  - 7  0 ❌  - 1 

Results for commit a8413c8. ± Comparison against base commit c2e77b2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[aceforeverd]

@QiChenX pls ensure all CIs pass

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.95%. Comparing base (c2e77b2) to head (a8413c8).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #3787      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     74.93%   74.95%   +0.01%     
  Complexity      658      658              
============================================
  Files           738      739       +1     
  Lines        133155   133157       +2     
  Branches       1380     1380              
============================================
+ Hits          99782    99805      +23     
+ Misses        33069    33048      -21     
  Partials        304      304              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.