Skip to content

Extensions: improve FAQ section wording#856

Merged
igorpecovnik merged 1 commit intoarmbian:mainfrom
leggewie:main
Dec 11, 2025
Merged

Extensions: improve FAQ section wording#856
igorpecovnik merged 1 commit intoarmbian:mainfrom
leggewie:main

Conversation

@leggewie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Extensions: improve FAQ section wording

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs review Seeking for review size/small PR with less then 50 lines labels Dec 11, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The PR updates the Developer-Guide_Extensions.md documentation file by shortening the descriptive text of two extension FAQ entries. The uboot-btrfs entry is condensed from a multi-sentence description to a single-line description, and the watchdog entry's description is rephrased. No structural changes, formatting modifications, or links are altered. This is a straightforward documentation text refinement.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single documentation file modified with minimal, straightforward text changes
  • Changes are homogeneous and cosmetic in nature (text trimming/rephrasing)
  • No logic, code structure, or control flow alterations

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Needs review, size/small

Suggested reviewers

  • igorpecovnik
  • EvilOlaf

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Extensions: improve FAQ section wording' accurately describes the main change in the pull request, which involves improving and refining the FAQ section wording in the Extensions documentation.
Description check ✅ Passed The description 'Extensions: improve FAQ section wording' is related to the changeset and aligns with the modifications made to the FAQ examples in the Extensions documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6d214f and 9320791.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/Developer-Guide_Extensions.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/Developer-Guide_Extensions.md (1)

106-107: Clear and consistent FAQ updates.

The reworded descriptions follow a consistent verb-first format that aligns with the preceding image-output-qcow2 entry. Both updates are concise, technically accurate, and maintain clarity about what each extension does.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@igorpecovnik igorpecovnik merged commit 8c80553 into armbian:main Dec 11, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs review Seeking for review size/small PR with less then 50 lines

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants