-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
{integer}..unresolved_ident suggests field access #131471
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-suggestion-diagnosticsArea: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`D-invalid-suggestionDiagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.Diagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-suggestion-diagnosticsArea: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`D-invalid-suggestionDiagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.Diagnostics: A structured suggestion resulting in incorrect code.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Code
Current output
Desired output
Rationale and extra context
Since integer literals do not have fields, it's odd to suggest field access.
It just confuses the user, rather than helping.
Other cases
No response
Rust Version
Anything else?
No response