-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
Clarify HashMap docs discussion of DoS protection #33817
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
E-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.E-help-wantedCall for participation: Help is requested to fix this issue.Call for participation: Help is requested to fix this issue.E-mentorCall for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
E-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.E-help-wantedCall for participation: Help is requested to fix this issue.Call for participation: Help is requested to fix this issue.E-mentorCall for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Today, the HashMap docs say:
While this is accurate, it's burying the lede: we should say much more clearly what the tradeoffs are, and point more directly toward the custom hashing infrastructure. E.g.: