-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
Confusing error when using a struct literal as an iterator #47360
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-parserArea: The lexing & parsing of Rust source code to an ASTArea: The lexing & parsing of Rust source code to an ASTC-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-parserArea: The lexing & parsing of Rust source code to an ASTArea: The lexing & parsing of Rust source code to an ASTC-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
It's confusing here, as it suggests using exactly what the user has typed. It should instead suggest the user parenthesise the struct literal.
(There's probably a reason this doesn't parse as-is, but if not, it seems like a nice case to handle.)