-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
Conflicting implementation of trait with generic_const_exprs feature #92186
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
A-const-genericsArea: const generics (parameters and arguments)Area: const generics (parameters and arguments)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.F-generic_const_exprs`#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]``#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]`P-lowLow priorityLow priorityT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-const-genericsArea: const generics (parameters and arguments)Area: const generics (parameters and arguments)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.F-generic_const_exprs`#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]``#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]`P-lowLow priorityLow priorityT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
I tried this code:
I expected to see this happen: This is the result when I commented
generic_const_exprsfeature.Instead, this happened:
Meta
rustc --version --verbose:Backtrace