Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error#120865
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Feb 10, 2024
Merged
Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error#120865bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @nnethercote rustbot has assigned @nnethercote. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
nnethercote
reviewed
Feb 10, 2024
| cgcx.output_filenames.temp_path(OutputType::Object, Some(&module.name)), | ||
| module.source.saved_files.get("o").expect("no saved object file in work product"), | ||
| module.source.saved_files.get("o").unwrap_or_else(|| { | ||
| cgcx.create_dcx().emit_fatal(errors::NoSavedObjectFile { cgu_name: &module.name }) |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is "CGU" the rustc term for what LLVM calls a "module"? I'm trying to understand the cgu_name/module.name inconsistency here.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I think that's what's going on here. I decided to call this a CGU name based on how CachedModuleCodegen are created:
rust/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/base.rs
Lines 770 to 773 in b5c46dc
Contributor
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
…rcote Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error I don't know if it's fair to say this fixes rust-lang#120854 but it surely makes the error reporting better and should encourage people with good instincts like `@CinchBlue.`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
…rcote Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error I don't know if it's fair to say this fixes rust-lang#120854 but it surely makes the error reporting better and should encourage people with good instincts like ``@CinchBlue.``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117614 (static mut: allow mutable reference to arbitrary types, not just slices and arrays) - rust-lang#120588 (wasm: Store rlib metadata in wasm object files) - rust-lang#120719 (Remove support for `associated_type_bound` nested in `dyn` types) - rust-lang#120823 (Clarify that atomic and regular integers can differ in alignment) - rust-lang#120859 (Loosen an assertion to account for stashed errors.) - rust-lang#120865 (Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error) - rust-lang#120866 (Remove unnecessary `#![feature(min_specialization)]`) - rust-lang#120870 (Allow restricted trait impls under `#[allow_internal_unstable(min_specialization)]`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117614 (static mut: allow mutable reference to arbitrary types, not just slices and arrays) - rust-lang#120719 (Remove support for `associated_type_bound` nested in `dyn` types) - rust-lang#120764 (Add documentation on `str::starts_with`) - rust-lang#120823 (Clarify that atomic and regular integers can differ in alignment) - rust-lang#120859 (Loosen an assertion to account for stashed errors.) - rust-lang#120865 (Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error) - rust-lang#120866 (Remove unnecessary `#![feature(min_specialization)]`) - rust-lang#120870 (Allow restricted trait impls under `#[allow_internal_unstable(min_specialization)]`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120865 - saethlin:missing-o-files, r=nnethercote Turn the "no saved object file in work product" ICE into a translatable fatal error I don't know if it's fair to say this fixes rust-lang#120854 but it surely makes the error reporting better and should encourage people with good instincts like ```@CinchBlue.```
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I don't know if it's fair to say this fixes #120854 but it surely makes the error reporting better and should encourage people with good instincts like @CinchBlue.