Convert many files to intra-doc links#76235
Conversation
|
@bors delegate=poliorcetics |
|
✌️ @poliorcetics can now approve this pull request |
|
cafab51 is now possible after #75652. I found both of these with |
|
Actually there are some more links I want to convert, so marking as WIP. |
d760bb6 to
0a14f2f
Compare
|
Found most of these using the regex in #75080 (comment). Once this and the claimed files are done I think the tracking issue will be almost ready to close :) except for primitives, upstream links, and |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Yeah bors is confused and doesn't know what to do about reviewers that aren't part of the rust-lang org. If you like I can assign myself, but that seems a little silly. |
LeSeulArtichaut
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me, left a nit and a question
|
Also I guess you may want to squash your commits before merging? |
I was planning to keep them as-is, one per file, but I can squash if you prefer. |
|
I don’t have any preference and I don’t even have merge permissions here, I was only suggesting this because I know some reviewers like to have everything clean and squashed |
|
One commit per file does not bother me but this is a doc PR so squashing won't lose much history or make bisecting harder. |
- Use intra-doc links for `std::io` in `std::fs` - Use intra-doc links for File::read in unix/ext/fs.rs - Remove explicit intra-doc links for `true` in `net/addr.rs` - Use intra-doc links in alloc/src/sync.rs - Use intra-doc links in src/ascii.rs - Switch to intra-doc links in alloc/rc.rs - Use intra-doc links in core/pin.rs - Use intra-doc links in std/prelude - Use shorter links in `std/fs.rs` `io` is already in scope.
94d6d7a to
bb10347
Compare
|
@poliorcetics did I miss a review comment, is this waiting on anything? |
|
No sorry, I just forgot I was the one responsible for this 😅. @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit bb10347 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions, checks-azure |
Helps with #75080
r? @poliorcetics
I recommend reviewing one commit at a time, but the diff is small enough you can do it all at once if you like :)