Conversation
`rchunks_exact` is not a more optimized version of `chunks`, but of `rchunks`.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @joshtriplett (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
|
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Fix doc for `rchunks_exact` `rchunks_exact` is not a more optimized version of `chunks`, but of `rchunks`.
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98383 (Remove restrictions on compare-exchange memory ordering.) - rust-lang#99350 (Be more precise when suggesting removal of parens on unit ctor) - rust-lang#99356 (Do not constraint TAITs when checking impl/trait item compatibility) - rust-lang#99360 (Do not ICE when we have `-Zunpretty=expanded` with invalid ABI) - rust-lang#99373 (Fix source code sidebar tree auto-expand) - rust-lang#99374 (Fix doc for `rchunks_exact`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rchunks_exactis not a more optimized version ofchunks, but ofrchunks.