Skip to content

Conversation

@mmerickel
Copy link
Member

fixes #110
replaces #221

@digitalresistor
Copy link
Member

I can understand the reasoning presented here, but I am not sure it is wise. I will however defer until later if this ends up blowing up for someone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unexpected behaviour for non-HTTP requests

3 participants