[🚀 Feature]: Selenium Manager support more architectures

[titusfortner]

Feature and motivation

Quick check of what architectures are supported by each driver...
Which of these should we support?
Do we need to wait until we can get rust and/or bazel to cross compile?
It looks like cross-compilation with cross might be straightforward - https://kerkour.com/rust-cross-compilation

Architecture	chromedriver	edgedriver	geckodriver
mac64	✅	✅	✅ 10%
linux64	✅	✅	✅ 48%
win32	✅	✅	✅ 5%
mac-arm64	✅	✅	✅ 10%
linux-arm64	❌	❌	🔲 2%
linux-32	❌	❌	🔲 1%
win-arm64	❌	✅	✅ 2%
win64	❌	✅	✅ 28%

[github-actions]

@titusfortner, thank you for creating this issue. We will troubleshoot it as soon as we can.

---

Info for maintainers

Triage this issue by using labels.

If information is missing, add a helpful comment and then I-issue-template label.

If the issue is a question, add the I-question label.

If the issue is valid but there is no time to troubleshoot it, consider adding the help wanted label.

If the issue requires changes or fixes from an external project (e.g., ChromeDriver, GeckoDriver, MSEdgeDriver, W3C), add the applicable G-* label, and it will provide the correct link and auto-close the issue.

After troubleshooting the issue, please add the R-awaiting answer label.

Thank you!

[titusfortner]

Well, played around a bit, and I could do:
https://github.com/titusfortner/selenium/actions/runs/3609798451

Note this builds x86_64-pc-windows-gnu but not x86_64-pc-windows-msvc

per the cross repo:

Additional Dockerfiles for other targets can be found in cross-toolchains. These include MSVC and Apple Darwin targets, which we cannot ship pre-built images of.

I could not figure out how to get those working, though; someone who knows more about docker than how to spell it might get further.