Skip to content

Conversation

@resmo
Copy link
Member

@resmo resmo commented Jun 23, 2015

Also see #510 (comment)

RFC @bhaisaab

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jun 23, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #633 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if this make sense but is Expunged not !Present as well?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, IMHO Expunged is not necessary but Expunging like we use for user e.g. https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack/blob/fix/CLOUDSTACK-8578-extend/server/src/com/cloud/api/query/QueryManagerImpl.java#L984

…ed VMs

So the behavior before this fix can be used in a proper way.
@resmo resmo changed the title CLOUDSTACK-8578: implement old behaviour for listing only non-destroy… CLOUDSTACK-8578: implement state=present for listing only non-destroyed VMs Jun 24, 2015
@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jun 24, 2015

cloudstack-pull-requests #641 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@asfgit asfgit closed this in af902fd Jun 24, 2015
kishankavala pushed a commit to kishankavala/cloudstack that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2015
…ed VMs

So the behavior before this fix can be used in a proper way.

Signed-off-by: Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>

This closes apache#513
@resmo resmo deleted the fix/CLOUDSTACK-8578-extend branch March 10, 2017 10:45
rohityadavcloud pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants