Skip to content

Conversation

@burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

@burblebee burblebee commented Feb 15, 2023

@burblebee burblebee marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2023 17:32
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2023-02 milestone Feb 16, 2023
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Feb 19, 2023
@burblebee burblebee force-pushed the motions-2023-02-cwg-3 branch from 3501bab to 7643924 Compare February 21, 2023 22:04
@burblebee burblebee removed the changes requested Changes to the wording or approach have been requested and not yet applied. label Feb 21, 2023
@burblebee burblebee requested review from JohelEGP and jensmaurer and removed request for JohelEGP February 21, 2023 22:11
@burblebee burblebee requested a review from JohelEGP February 28, 2023 04:52
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2023-02-cwg-3 branch from 99116b3 to b3886b8 Compare March 5, 2023 17:26
or the expression is evaluated in the context of a template definition,
the declaration has no
effect. Otherwise,
%FIXME: What does it mean for a grammar term to fail? Also in [temp.res]/p6.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this text the definition of what it means for the static_assert-declaration to fail?

@jensmaurer, any thoughts? I think this seems clear?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's the intent: We defined "fails" here.

Note that the proposed resolution in CWG2518 marks "fails" in italics to highlight the fact this is a term definition.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not in italics in this PR. Also, does #6120 (comment), which made "int" into int, makes sense if the error comment is supposed to be a reproduction of the string-literal to the static_assert?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, good catch, we need to italicise fails, thank you!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2023-02-cwg-3 branch from b3886b8 to b334df6 Compare March 5, 2023 17:31
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 7452792 into main Mar 5, 2023
@tkoeppe tkoeppe deleted the motions-2023-02-cwg-3 branch May 10, 2023 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

5 participants