Regenerate protobuf using latest grpcio and protobuf pakcages. #185
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
Author
bobh66
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
Collaborator
bobh66
left a comment
bobh66
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A couple of questions and formatting but other than that it LGTM.
Signed-off-by: Patrick J. McNerthney <[email protected]>
iciclespider
force-pushed
the
regen-protobuf
branch
from
768b21e to
88ac84d
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of your changes
Preparing for a new release using the latest package updates from renovate.
Ensured both the grpcio and protobuf versions are all in sync with each other and then regenerated the protobuf classes.
Fixes #184
I have: