-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
Fixed SvelteKit integration hook types #394
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @2chanhaeng, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the SvelteKit integration by resolving type inference issues within its hooks. By adopting SvelteKit's native type definitions, the changes ensure that users receive accurate request and response types, making the integration more robust and easier to work with, ultimately improving the overall developer experience for SvelteKit users.
Highlights
- SvelteKit Type Inference Fix: The pull request addresses an issue where SvelteKit integration hooks did not correctly infer request and response types, leading to improved type safety and developer experience.
- Dependency Update: The
@sveltejs/kitpackage has been explicitly added as a dependency inpackages/sveltekit/deno.jsonto support the type improvements. - Refactored Hook Definitions: Custom
RequestEventandHookParamstypes withinpackages/sveltekit/src/mod.tshave been replaced with direct imports ofHandleandRequestEventfrom@sveltejs/kit, aligning the integration more closely with SvelteKit's native types. - Simplified
fedifyHookSignature: ThefedifyHookfunction now leverages theHandletype from SvelteKit and provides a defaultcreateContextDatafunction, simplifying its usage. - Updated Test Suite: The test file
packages/sveltekit/src/mod.test.tshas been updated to reflect the new type definitions and ensure compatibility with the SvelteKit-native types.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
dahlia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we change the package.json either?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes the SvelteKit integration hook types by using the official types from @sveltejs/kit and making the createContextData parameter optional. The changes are in the right direction, but I've found a type safety issue in the implementation of the optional parameter which could lead to runtime errors. I've suggested using function overloads to fix this. I also noticed a minor omission in the CHANGES.md file.
Summary
Fixed SvelteKit integration hook types.
Related Issue
Changes
packages/sveltekitBenefits
Now users who use SvelteKit integration can get proper hook types.
Checklist
[ ] Did you write some relevant docs about this change (if it's a new feature)?[ ] Did you write some tests for this change (if it's a new feature)?deno task test-allon your machine?Additional Notes