Skip to content

[bugfix] on issue-label-change via API trigger webhooks too #10421

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
zeripath merged 11 commits into from
Feb 23, 2020
Merged

[bugfix] on issue-label-change via API trigger webhooks too #10421

zeripath merged 11 commits into from
Feb 23, 2020

Conversation

@6543
Copy link
Member

@6543 6543 commented Feb 23, 2020

close #9403

@techknowlogick techknowlogick added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Feb 23, 2020
guillep2k
guillep2k reviewed Feb 23, 2020
View reviewed changes
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 23, 2020
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Feb 23, 2020 •
edited
Loading

@techknowlogick think this is an bug witch is already in 1.11.x so we need a backport :O

@6543 6543 requested a review from guillep2k February 23, 2020 02:53
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Feb 23, 2020

ready to review

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Feb 23, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Feb 23, 2020
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Feb 23, 2020

what is wrong with this CI ...

@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Feb 23, 2020

Complains about duplicate code:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go:70: 70-142 lines are duplicate of routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go:216-288 (dupl)

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Feb 23, 2020

now It's a refactor too ;)

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Feb 23, 2020

wake up lgtm

guillep2k
guillep2k suggested changes Feb 23, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@guillep2k guillep2k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I missed this check

@zeripath zeripath changed the title [bugfix] on issue-lable-change via API trigger webhooks too [bugfix] on issue-label-change via API trigger webhooks too Feb 23, 2020
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 23, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #10421 into master will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10421      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   43.66%   43.71%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         586      586              
  Lines       81389    81389              
==========================================
+ Hits        35538    35580      +42     
+ Misses      41457    41410      -47     
- Partials     4394     4399       +5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/process/manager.go 74.69% <0%> (-3.62%) ⬇️
modules/queue/unique_queue_disk_channel.go 53.84% <0%> (-1.93%) ⬇️
models/pull.go 42.37% <0%> (+0.55%) ⬆️
models/notification.go 65.18% <0%> (+1.05%) ⬆️
services/pull/pull.go 36.07% <0%> (+1.17%) ⬆️
services/pull/temp_repo.go 34.18% <0%> (+2.56%) ⬆️
services/pull/patch.go 66.03% <0%> (+3.14%) ⬆️
services/pull/check.go 55.48% <0%> (+17.07%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4ce262a...a22bf3c. Read the comment docs.

@x-beaudet
Copy link

x-beaudet commented Feb 23, 2020

smells good ! thanx ! :-)

@zeripath zeripath merged commit 39b507e into go-gitea:master Feb 23, 2020
@6543 6543 deleted the fix_9403 branch February 23, 2020 23:41
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Feb 24, 2020

Please send backport.

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Feb 24, 2020

I will tomorow, if someone like to send a backport, feel free to

6543 added a commit to 6543-forks/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
@6543
Trigger webhooks on issue label-change via API too (go-gitea#10421)
0967800 
* trigger webhooks with api too

* fix comment

* notify report old too

* CI restart

* restart CI again

* remove duplicated code
@6543 6543 mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2020
Merged
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented Feb 24, 2020

done -> #10439

@guillep2k guillep2k added the backport/done All backports for this PR have been created label Feb 24, 2020
zeripath pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
@6543
Trigger webhooks on issue label-change via API too (#10421) (#10439)
9e6ad64 
* trigger webhooks with api too

* fix comment

* notify report old too

* CI restart

* restart CI again

* remove duplicated code
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@lunny lunny lunny approved these changes

@lafriks lafriks lafriks approved these changes

+1 more reviewer

@guillep2k guillep2k guillep2k approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

backport/done All backports for this PR have been created lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.12.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Webhook not activated when setting a label on an issue

10 participants

@6543 @lafriks @codecov-io @x-beaudet @lunny @guillep2k @techknowlogick @zeripath @GiteaBot @jolheiser