Skip to content

Integration tests for issues API #2059

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
lunny merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2017
Merged

Integration tests for issues API #2059

lunny merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2017

Conversation

@ethantkoenig
Copy link
Member

@ethantkoenig ethantkoenig commented Jun 25, 2017

Also simplify the ListIssues(..) router.

@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Jun 25, 2017
@lunny lunny added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Jun 25, 2017
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jun 25, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Jun 25, 2017
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Jun 25, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jun 25, 2017
@lunny lunny merged commit 7356762 into go-gitea:master Jun 25, 2017
@ethantkoenig ethantkoenig deleted the test/issue_api branch June 26, 2017 14:53
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. type/testing

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.2.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ethantkoenig @lunny @lafriks @tboerger