-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
Open
Labels
Awaiting More FeedbackThis means we'd like to hear from more people who would be helped by this featureThis means we'd like to hear from more people who would be helped by this featureSuggestionAn idea for TypeScriptAn idea for TypeScript
Description
Search Terms
ownProperty
hasOwnProperty
noUncheckedIndexedAccess
type check
Suggestion
noUncheckedIndexedAccess is a great feature. However, ts reports that object can be undefined even with hasOwnProperty check.
I suggest that a hasOwnProperty check makes unchecked indexed accesses checked, and return the checked value.
Use Cases
const obj: {[key: string]: string} = {};
// do something with obj
const key = "someKey";
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
console.log(obj[key].length); // TS2532: Object is possibly 'undefined'.
}Since only string values are allowed in obj, the only case such value is undefined is when the key does not exist on obj. The value of obj[key] can only be string. However, typescript still reports type of obj[key] being string | undefined.
Examples
const obj: {[key: string]: string} = {};
// do something with obj
const key = "someKey";
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key)) {
console.log(obj[key].length); // no problem, since obj[key] has correct type string
}Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
satackey, kot9ta, ranneyd, cheeZery, KaelWD and 2 moreranneyd and niedzielski
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting More FeedbackThis means we'd like to hear from more people who would be helped by this featureThis means we'd like to hear from more people who would be helped by this featureSuggestionAn idea for TypeScriptAn idea for TypeScript