src: use MaybeLocal.ToLocal instead of IsEmpty #33457
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit suggest using MaybeLocal.ToLocal and passing in the Local<Function> fun. The motivation for doing this is that the following MaybeLocal.ToLocalChecked call can then be avoided.
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
c++
Collaborator
himself65
approved these changes
May 18, 2020
cjihrig
approved these changes
May 18, 2020
addaleax
approved these changes
May 18, 2020
jasnell
approved these changes
May 18, 2020
devnexen
approved these changes
May 18, 2020
addaleax
added
the
author ready
Collaborator
danbev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2020
This commit suggest using MaybeLocal.ToLocal and passing in the Local<Function> fun. The motivation for doing this is that the following MaybeLocal.ToLocalChecked call can then be avoided. PR-URL: #33457 Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Contributor
Author
|
Landed in 979ec42. |
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2020
This commit suggest using MaybeLocal.ToLocal and passing in the Local<Function> fun. The motivation for doing this is that the following MaybeLocal.ToLocalChecked call can then be avoided. PR-URL: #33457 Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2020
This commit suggest using MaybeLocal.ToLocal and passing in the Local<Function> fun. The motivation for doing this is that the following MaybeLocal.ToLocalChecked call can then be avoided. PR-URL: #33457 Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit suggest using
MaybeLocal.ToLocaland passing in theLocal<Function> fun.The motivation for doing this is that the following
MaybeLocal.ToLocalCheckedcall can then be avoided.Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes