Skip to content

Conversation

@voctory
Copy link
Contributor

@voctory voctory commented Dec 12, 2025

Notes

  • Extend reasoning-effort popup warning eligibility to gpt-5.2* models for the Extra High (xhigh) option.

Revisions

  • R2: Remove unnecessary tests and snapshots
  • R1: initial

Testing

  • just fix, cargo test -p codex-tui, and cargo test -p codex-tui2
  • Manual testing

Before:
image

After (consistent with GPT 5.1 Codex Max):
image

image

@voctory
Copy link
Contributor Author

voctory commented Dec 12, 2025

@codex r

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Contributor

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Contributor

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Copy link
Collaborator

@etraut-openai etraut-openai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution. I don't think tests are needed for these changes. They're unlikely to regress. Other than that, it looks good.

}

#[test]
fn model_reasoning_selection_popup_extra_high_warning_gpt52_snapshot() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No test is needed here. Please delete.

assert_snapshot!("model_reasoning_selection_popup_extra_high_warning", popup);
}

#[test]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No test is needed here. Please delete.

@etraut-openai etraut-openai added the needs-response Additional information is requested label Dec 12, 2025
- Extend reasoning-effort popup warning eligibility to gpt-5.2* models for the Extra high (xhigh) option.
- Add snapshot tests and accept new snapshots for the gpt-5.2 extra-high warning in codex-tui and codex-tui2.
@voctory voctory force-pushed the warn-xhigh-usage-5-2 branch from f6052fa to bcbb72d Compare December 12, 2025 05:22
@voctory
Copy link
Contributor Author

voctory commented Dec 12, 2025

@codex r

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Contributor

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@voctory
Copy link
Contributor Author

voctory commented Dec 12, 2025

Thanks for the feedback @etraut-openai, I've removed those tests

@etraut-openai etraut-openai enabled auto-merge (squash) December 12, 2025 06:24
@etraut-openai etraut-openai merged commit 9287be7 into openai:main Dec 12, 2025
45 of 47 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 12, 2025
@etraut-openai etraut-openai removed the needs-response Additional information is requested label Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants