Skip to content

Conversation

@adangel
Copy link
Member

@adangel adangel commented Oct 30, 2025

Describe the PR

Related issues

Ready?

  • Added unit tests for fixed bug/feature
  • Passing all unit tests
  • Complete build ./mvnw clean verify passes (checked automatically by github actions)
  • Added (in-code) documentation (if needed)

@adangel adangel added this to the 7.19.0 milestone Oct 30, 2025
@adangel adangel added the a:new-rule Proposal to add a new built-in rule label Oct 30, 2025
@pmd-actions-helper
Copy link
Contributor

pmd-actions-helper bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Documentation Preview

Compared to main:
This changeset changes 0 violations,
introduces 210 new violations, 0 new errors and 0 new configuration errors,
removes 0 violations, 25 errors and 8 configuration errors.

Regression Tester Report

(comment created at 2025-11-06 15:07:08+00:00 for e7de25f)

@adangel adangel force-pushed the java/new-rule-enum-comparison branch from 3bdf8d3 to e7de25f Compare November 6, 2025 14:47
@adangel adangel self-assigned this Nov 27, 2025
@adangel adangel merged commit d05bcb5 into pmd:main Nov 27, 2025
12 checks passed
adangel added a commit to adangel/pmd that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2025
adangel added a commit to adangel/pmd that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2025
@adangel adangel deleted the java/new-rule-enum-comparison branch November 27, 2025 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

a:new-rule Proposal to add a new built-in rule

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[java] New Rule: Always compare enum values with ==

2 participants