new selectors module should support devpoll on Solaris

[giampaolo]

BPO	18931
Nosy	@gvanrossum, @jcea, @pitrou, @vstinner, @giampaolo, @tiran, @meadori, @felipecruz, @1st1
Files	devpoll.patch devpoll2.patch devpoll3.patch devpoll3_try_again.diff

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/giampaolo'
closed_at = <Date 2014-03-20.20:55:40.696>
created_at = <Date 2013-09-05.10:58:35.550>
labels = ['library']
title = 'new selectors module should support devpoll on Solaris'
updated_at = <Date 2014-03-20.20:57:23.713>
user = 'https://github.com/giampaolo'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2014-03-20.20:57:23.713>
actor = 'giampaolo.rodola'
assignee = 'giampaolo.rodola'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2014-03-20.20:55:40.696>
closer = 'giampaolo.rodola'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2013-09-05.10:58:35.550>
creator = 'giampaolo.rodola'
dependencies = []
files = ['31618', '34494', '34522', '34535']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 18931
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 19.0
messages = ['196989', '197015', '200756', '202118', '213886', '213898', '213900', '213901', '213909', '214008', '214016', '214023', '214027', '214118', '214137', '214207', '214275', '214280', '214282']
nosy_count = 13.0
nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'jcea', 'pitrou', 'vstinner', 'giampaolo.rodola', 'christian.heimes', 'meador.inge', 'neologix', 'rosslagerwall', 'python-dev', 'sbt', 'felipecruz', 'yselivanov']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue18931'
versions = ['Python 3.5']

[giampaolo]

This is a follow up of bpo-16853.
I will try to see whether I can come up with a patch later today.

[giampaolo]

Patch is in attachment.

[neologix]

Just to let you know that I'm not forgetting this issue.
I'd just like to iron-out issue bpo-19172 (keys()-like method for selectors), since it could impact the API, to avoid repeated refactoring.

[vstinner]

@giampaolo: Your patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore. Could you update it?

Issue bpo-19172 has been fixed, selectors now have a get_map() method.

[jcea]

We missed 3.4 :-(.

Targeting Python 3.5 now. Giampaolo, could you possibly refresh your patch?. Thanks.

[giampaolo]

Sorry for not being able to rewrite the patch in time for 3.4.
I will provide an updated patch (I need to setup an Open Solaris box first though).
The code for poll(), epoll() and /dev/poll will have many similarities, so I think it makes sense to refactor it and use a base class to avoid code duplication, similarly to what I did in my original patch.

[gvanrossum]

I actually prefer some code duplication in this case. Makes the review
easier.
On Mar 17, 2014 2:17 PM, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment:

Sorry for not being able to rewrite the patch in time for 3.4.
I will provide an updated patch (I need to setup an Open Solaris box first
though).
The code for poll(), epoll() and /dev/poll will have many similarities, so
I think it makes sense to refactor it and use a base class to avoid code
duplication, similarly to what I did in my original patch.

----------

---

Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18931\>

---

[giampaolo]

OK, I will provide a patch soon.

[jcea]

BDFL talked :-).

I can test the patch on a Solaris box, and Python has OpenSolaris buildbots.

[giampaolo]

Patch in attachment.

[neologix]

Could you regenerate it without --git (it doesn't show under the review
tool)?

[1st1]

Why there is no 'review' link for the new patch?

[gvanrossum]

review links are only generated for patches that apply cleanly (I don't
know to which branch)

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Yury Selivanov <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:

Yury Selivanov added the comment:

Why there is no 'review' link for the new patch?

----------

---

Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue18931\>

---

[giampaolo]

Regenerated without --git.

[1st1]

Still no review link. Somehow you managed to upload the first patch correctly. Does the new one apply cleanly on the default branch?