tabnanny unit tests

[ColinWilliams]

BPO	19382
Nosy	@vstinner, @ezio-melotti, @berkerpeksag
PRs	bpo-19382: Adding test cases for module tabnanny. #851
Files	tabnanny.patch

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2018-06-14.07:09:42.861>
created_at = <Date 2013-10-24.22:58:45.715>
labels = ['3.8', 'type-feature', 'tests']
title = 'tabnanny unit tests'
updated_at = <Date 2018-06-14.07:09:42.858>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/ColinWilliams'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2018-06-14.07:09:42.858>
actor = 'vstinner'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2018-06-14.07:09:42.861>
closer = 'vstinner'
components = ['Tests']
creation = <Date 2013-10-24.22:58:45.715>
creator = 'Colin.Williams'
dependencies = []
files = ['32344']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 19382
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 6.0
messages = ['201194', '201195', '201196', '203108', '319498', '319500']
nosy_count = 4.0
nosy_names = ['vstinner', 'ezio.melotti', 'berker.peksag', 'Colin.Williams']
pr_nums = ['851']
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue19382'
versions = ['Python 3.8']

[ColinWilliams]

I didn't test the stdout and stderr stuff, but I got the module up to 74% coverage.

[berkerpeksag]

See also bpo-19102.

[ColinWilliams]

Alright, I'll wait until that one gets committed, and then add in my changes. I think between the two of us we'll get close to 100%

[ezio-melotti]

I left a few comments on rietveld.

[vstinner]

New changeset dfa9643 by Victor Stinner (Jaysinh Shukla) in branch 'master':
bpo-19382: Adding test cases for module tabnanny (GH-851)
dfa9643

[vstinner]

Thanks Jaysinh Shukla for adding new unit tests to tabnanny, good job!

I don't think that it's worth it to backport the new tests to 2.7, 3.6 or 3.7 branch.