Deprecate asyncore/asynchat

[gvanrossum]

BPO	25002
Nosy	@gvanrossum, @warsaw, @brettcannon, @rhettinger, @vstinner, @ericvsmith, @giampaolo, @bitdancer, @vadmium, @serhiy-storchaka, @dstufft, @Mariatta
Dependencies	bpo-25008: Deprecate smtpd (based on deprecated asyncore/asynchat)
Files	issue25002.patch

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2017-04-19.21:55:22.038>
created_at = <Date 2015-09-04.20:48:03.817>
labels = ['3.7', 'type-feature', 'library']
title = 'Deprecate asyncore/asynchat'
updated_at = <Date 2017-04-20.01:12:35.577>
user = 'https://github.com/gvanrossum'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2017-04-20.01:12:35.577>
actor = 'barry'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2017-04-19.21:55:22.038>
closer = 'gvanrossum'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2015-09-04.20:48:03.817>
creator = 'gvanrossum'
dependencies = ['25008']
files = ['45210']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 25002
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 37.0
messages = ['249829', '249830', '249831', '249833', '249855', '249873', '249882', '249912', '250109', '250150', '250151', '250214', '250223', '250232', '250233', '250234', '250239', '250260', '279352', '279416', '279417', '279424', '279429', '279436', '279437', '279438', '279440', '279442', '279444', '279450', '279464', '279469', '279477', '279478', '291909', '291912', '291929']
nosy_count = 13.0
nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'barry', 'brett.cannon', 'rhettinger', 'vstinner', 'eric.smith', 'giampaolo.rodola', 'r.david.murray', 'python-dev', 'martin.panter', 'serhiy.storchaka', 'dstufft', 'Mariatta']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue25002'
versions = ['Python 3.6', 'Python 3.7']

[gvanrossum]

Now that we've got asyncio in two releases (3.4 and 3.5) we should start deprecating asyncore and asynchat. There isn't much use of these in the stdlib (smtpd.py uses them, and a bunch of tests) and we should probably rewrite those to use asyncio. Maybe smtpd.py can be deprecated itself.

[dstufft]

I'm all for deprecating asyncore/asynchat but should deprecating them wait until asyncio is no longer provisional?

[gvanrossum]

Yes, in 3.6 asyncio will no longer be provisional and we can start deprecating async{ore,hat}. Which is why I marked this bug with 3.6.

[vstinner]

The documentation of both modules begin with the following note:

"This module exists for backwards compatibility only. For new code we recommend using asyncio."

What do you mean by deprecating the module? Emit a PendingDeprecationWarning in Python 3.6 and emit a DeprecationWarning in Python 3.7?

Maybe smtpd.py can be deprecated itself.

Maybe it can be fun to rewrite the module using asyncio, but I'm not convinced that a SMTP server in the Python stdlib is super useful.

(A HTTP server *is* very useful, it saved my life multiple times when I worked on embedded devices without any server available to transfer files.)

[gvanrossum]

Ideally these modules should emit a deprecation warning starting in 3.6 (when asyncio is no longer provisional) and we should strive to delete them per 3.8.

If nobody rewrites smptd.py using asyncio it should be deleted at the same time.

[ericvsmith]

I use smtpd.py for testing my code. But it's not such a big deal that I couldn't live without it. If I have some time to burn, I might convert it to asyncio so I can continue to use it.

[bitdancer]

smtpd is used for testing smtplib. It is also used in test_logging. I would object to having it removed, but I suspect we can manage to rewrite it by 3.8. Maybe Eric and I can collaborate on it.

[brettcannon]

I opened http://bugs.python.org/issue25008 to discuss deprecating smtpd since this issue is about asyncore/asynchat.

[warsaw]

On Sep 04, 2015, at 08:55 PM, STINNER Victor wrote:

Maybe it can be fun to rewrite the module using asyncio, but I'm not
convinced that a SMTP server in the Python stdlib is super useful.

As I mentioned in bpo-25008, removing smtpd would be a hardship for myself,
and I don't think I'm alone. I would however love to have (and maybe even
work on <wink>) an asyncio-based version. I do think it is useful to have an
SMTP server in the stdlib - and actually, I'd also like to have an LMTP server
there too. But I think we can take baby steps toward this by some folks
getting together and writing a third party asyncio-based module, releasing
this on PyPI and eventually leading to its inclusion in Python down the road.
I think there's no hurry to remove smtpd, but it can be deprecated-in-place
like optparse, as someone else mentioned.

[rhettinger]

Now that we've got asyncio in two releases (3.4 and 3.5)
we should start deprecating asyncore and asynchat.

If we care about making it easier for organizations to move from Python 2 to Python 3, we should develop a strong aversion to deprecating modules that have been around for a long time and aren't broken.

In addition, we should give weight and support to the numerous projects that are trying to have a code base the runs in both Python 2 and Python 3 (hence the astonishing success of the six module).

Already my tooling for testing Python 3.6 is broken because some core dev aggressively removed functions from the inspect module that were deprecated in favor of using Signature objects. That broke the popular Hypothesis testing tool which was carefully written to work for both Python 2 and Python 3. In order to work again that tool will have to be modified to copy in the old code that was just taken out.

don't-leave-your-users-behind-ly yours ...

[gvanrossum]

Then can we at least close any feature requests for asyncore/asynchat as wontfix? (And porting smtpd.py to asyncio is still a good idea.)

[bitdancer]

Yes, stopping changing asyncore/asynchat also means it becomes a stable target for people who *are* using it for 2/3 code. We may have effectively done this already (without closing the open issues): the last asyncore-specific change (as opposed to library-wide changes that also hit asyncore) was a ResourceWarning added by Victor in June of 2014. Likewise for asynchat.

[vstinner]

If you care of smooth python 2 => python 3 migration, I suggest to
deprecate smtpd and remove it later, when asyncore & asynchat will
also be removed (ex: in Python 4?).

I suggest to write a *new* SMTP server module using asyncio. As I
explained, the API will be very different for the user of the API.

[brettcannon]

Victor's suggestion also aligns with my thinking on the subject as well: deprecate the modules but simply leave them sitting there for compatibility reasons until Python 4 of whenever we feel like the Python 2 transition is done for those that will ever bother making the switch. That way people's expectations are in the proper alignment of where things will end up and code won't break if it straddles Python 2 & 3 short of having to silence a deprecation warning. I think this is a good use of PendingDeprecationWarning and the message both in the deprecation and the docs can make it clear that the removal date is not planned but you should avoid using the module in new code.

[vstinner]

Ideally these modules should emit a deprecation warning starting in 3.6

Is it ok to add the PendingDeprecationWarning in Python 3.5.1?