[3.6] bpo-35116: Adding Doc/library entries for max_num_fields #10248
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
(cherry picked from commit 98ace4b) Co-authored-by: Matt Belisle <[email protected]>
matthewbelisle-wf
force-pushed
the
backport-98ace4b-3.6
branch
from
437d54a to
39da7a9
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
For your review @vstinner from your comment in #9969 (comment). |
Contributor
Author
|
Okay this is ready for review again @vstinner Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(cherry picked from commit 98ace4b)
Co-authored-by: Matt Belisle [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue35116