Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 20, 2018

Fixes assertion failures in _datetimemodule.c
introduced in the previous fix (see bpo-31752).

Rather of trying to handle an int subclass as exact int,
let it to use overridden special methods, but check the
result of divmod().
(cherry picked from commit 3ec0f49)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue35021

Fixes assertion failures in _datetimemodule.c
introduced in the previous fix (see bpo-31752).

Rather of trying to handle an int subclass as exact int,
let it to use overridden special methods, but check the
result of divmod().
(cherry picked from commit 3ec0f49)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 7a0d964 into python:3.6 Nov 20, 2018
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-3ec0f49-3.6 branch November 20, 2018 19:02
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip news type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants