Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 7, 2024

…pe implementation (pythonGH-122047)

(cherry picked from commit 0bd9375)

Co-authored-by: Lucas Esposito <[email protected]>
@zooba
Copy link
Member

zooba commented Aug 7, 2024

@Yhg1s Requesting consideration for rc2. This is an older issue, and will be fixed in 3.12 and 3.13.1 (if not sooner). It's silently suppressing a particular error code in a native port of a Python function - the equivalent error is suppressed in the Python function.

I didn't find any obvious posts about branch policy right now, but I'm assuming we need RM approval for post-RC changes? Though the branch is not locked.

@Yhg1s
Copy link
Member

Yhg1s commented Sep 2, 2024

I didn't find any obvious posts about branch policy right now, but I'm assuming we need RM approval for post-RC changes? Though the branch is not locked.

FWIW, there's no need for RM approval (because I've been somewhat busy quitting Google): https://discuss.python.org/t/3-13-branch-locked-for-the-rc1-release/59612

There's still the policy of requiring review on PRs to the branch, but it doesn't have to be RM review.

@Yhg1s Yhg1s merged commit f070398 into python:3.13 Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants