Skip to content

Conversation

@benjaminp
Copy link
Contributor

Azure runs macOS, so we don't need Travis to do it.

Azure runs macOS, so we don't need Travis to do it.
@ammaraskar
Copy link
Member

Is overlap the only motivation for removal here? I don't think overlap is necessarily bad, after all we run Linux on both Travis and Azure as well. Windows is run on Azure and AppVeyor. The redundancy helps to figure out flaky tests/race conditions and provides some actionable information in case a particular provider goes down.

@benjaminp
Copy link
Contributor Author

benjaminp commented Sep 9, 2019 via email

@zooba
Copy link
Member

zooba commented Sep 10, 2019

I agree with this particular one, since the Travis resources are limited.

I'd prefer to keep as many parallel builds as we can though, especially cross-CI system, as that gives us better representation of different user environments.

@benjaminp benjaminp merged commit e45b217 into master Sep 10, 2019
@benjaminp benjaminp deleted the travis-macOS branch September 10, 2019 10:28
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @benjaminp for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-15831 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

Copy link
Member

@ned-deily ned-deily left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that running the tests under macOS on Travis has not proved to be very effective at finding real problems so I support making this change. Thanks!

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
Azure runs macOS, so we don't need Travis to do it.
(cherry picked from commit e45b217)

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Peterson <[email protected]>
websurfer5 pushed a commit to websurfer5/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
Azure runs macOS, so we don't need Travis to do it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants