Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Sep 10, 2019

As described in Doc/c-api/init.rst, PyEval_InitThreads() cannot be called
before Py_Initialize() function.
(cherry picked from commit 9e61066)

Co-authored-by: Kenta Murata [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue32165

As described in Doc/c-api/init.rst, PyEval_InitThreads() cannot be called
before Py_Initialize() function.
(cherry picked from commit 9e61066)

Co-authored-by: Kenta Murata <[email protected]>
@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Our records indicate we have not received your CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

If you have recently signed the CLA, please wait at least one business day
before our records are updated.

You can check yourself to see if the CLA has been received.

Thanks again for your contribution, we look forward to reviewing it!

@benjaminp benjaminp changed the title [3.8] Fix calling order of PyEval_InitThreads. (GH-4602) [3.8] closes bpo-32165: Fix calling order of PyEval_InitThreads. (GH-4602) Sep 10, 2019
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mrkn and @benjaminp: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mrkn and @benjaminp: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mrkn and @benjaminp: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@benjaminp benjaminp merged commit 21dacea into python:3.8 Sep 10, 2019
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-9e61066-3.8 branch September 10, 2019 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants