Skip to content

Conversation

@ammaraskar
Copy link
Member

@ammaraskar ammaraskar commented Apr 19, 2021

As mentioned in the bug, this is an obvious improvement that makes the table more natural and brings it in-line with precedence tables from other languages.

https://bugs.python.org/issue43837

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels Apr 19, 2021
@ammaraskar ammaraskar changed the title Reverse order of precedence table to show tightly binding operators first bpo-43837: Reverse order of precedence table to show tightly binding operators first Apr 19, 2021
@terryjreedy terryjreedy self-requested a review April 19, 2021 06:00
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ammaraskar for the PR, and @rhettinger for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-25472 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2021
…operators first (pythonGH-25469)

(cherry picked from commit 68ba0c6)

Co-authored-by: Ammar Askar <[email protected]>
rhettinger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants